Laserfiche WebLink
IJ <br />u <br />1 <br />�J <br />11 <br />l: <br />1; <br />1: <br />12 <br />15 <br />l6 <br />17 <br />1R <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />27 <br />1 they approved it up to this point and allowed us to go ahead <br />2 with this next step, which is the P "blic participation <br />3 step. <br />4 So as far as decisions being made, I would tell <br />5 you at this point no decisions have been made, although a <br />b cost effective analysis has been conducted within the report <br />7 "bich confirmed the Prier feasibility report that Terry <br />B mentioned that the low pressure type sewer system is cost <br />effective for this application here. <br />MR. SCITRIXTY: For the grant application, in order <br />to get awarded that, you have to use the most cost effective <br />method, which is what you just demonstrated. <br />?'R. ?11ThYSCAARP: That is right. <br />10R. FRAILS: well, was this to determine which <br />System is going to he used, or is there going to he other <br />hearings on this? <br />MR. MM-TSCAARD: Well, there will be a hearing <br />with the County Commission wher the final report is broUght <br />before them for adoption. And at that time, T'm sure that <br />the County commission. will take public testimony again or <br />comments from the public in relationship to whether they <br />should go ahead with the program or Pot. And at that time, <br />you'd obviously he able to speak again. <br />"P. FRP,TT.S: Ts that the time that the system will <br />be determined? <br />ZAMPATAR O f A ISSOC IATES <br />A romputer Assisted Transcript <br />(305)569-0p10 <br />