Laserfiche WebLink
J <br />1� <br />1 <br />it J <br />1 <br />J <br />28 <br />1 VR. hMVKSUAPP: T would say yes. In that final <br />2 report that we would prepare for the County and submit then <br />3 to the funding agency, in that final report, a <br />4 recommendation will be contained within that recommending <br />S one type of sewer system over the other, and then the County <br />6 Commission will he required to pass an authorizing <br />7 resolcltion accepting the documents as is or with various <br />8 modifications that is so desired ?-y the rounty and to he <br />9 incorporated and then sent on to the State for final <br />I certification. <br />I vR. FPAILS: I'm sure everybody in here wants the <br />system, including myself. It's just that you say cost <br />effective for the County, b »t how about cost effective for <br />the individual home owner. That's the important part. <br />PTNTO: Let me make comment on that for you. <br />And T want everyone to understand. When we talk about <br />what's most cost effective for you, the user of the system <br />or the person livirg in Rockridge. There are several <br />concerns that you have, and he makes a very good point, and <br />our, the thrust of our feasibility study is to what's most <br />cost effective for you, the individual, first, and second, <br />the system as a whole, the County utility system. <br />r'ow, when we say that, the only cost that you <br />receive that's different than anyone else is the cost, as T <br />said in the beginning, the cost of the construction of the <br />ZAMPATAPn $ ASSorTATFS <br />A. Computer Assisted Transcript <br />(305)569-0910 <br />1. <br />1! <br />' <br />if <br />li <br />lA <br />' <br />19 <br />20 <br />' <br />2? <br />22 <br />' <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />J <br />28 <br />1 VR. hMVKSUAPP: T would say yes. In that final <br />2 report that we would prepare for the County and submit then <br />3 to the funding agency, in that final report, a <br />4 recommendation will be contained within that recommending <br />S one type of sewer system over the other, and then the County <br />6 Commission will he required to pass an authorizing <br />7 resolcltion accepting the documents as is or with various <br />8 modifications that is so desired ?-y the rounty and to he <br />9 incorporated and then sent on to the State for final <br />I certification. <br />I vR. FPAILS: I'm sure everybody in here wants the <br />system, including myself. It's just that you say cost <br />effective for the County, b »t how about cost effective for <br />the individual home owner. That's the important part. <br />PTNTO: Let me make comment on that for you. <br />And T want everyone to understand. When we talk about <br />what's most cost effective for you, the user of the system <br />or the person livirg in Rockridge. There are several <br />concerns that you have, and he makes a very good point, and <br />our, the thrust of our feasibility study is to what's most <br />cost effective for you, the individual, first, and second, <br />the system as a whole, the County utility system. <br />r'ow, when we say that, the only cost that you <br />receive that's different than anyone else is the cost, as T <br />said in the beginning, the cost of the construction of the <br />ZAMPATAPn $ ASSorTATFS <br />A. Computer Assisted Transcript <br />(305)569-0910 <br />