Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />t <br />11 <br />11 <br />M <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />R <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />1.3 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />I'S <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />z1 <br />'VP . 17RATI.S: U'el l , thank you. Put actually, it <br />boils down to the cheapest way is tre most possible way to <br />get the grant, not the hest way. <br />MR. PINTO: Yo. The most cost effective way. The <br />most cost effective way is the hest way, 1,ecause we're not <br />looking at only today's construction cost. Vic have to add <br />in the operating cost and we tiave to look, as the engineer <br />said, we have to compare apples and apples. So you have to <br />take the conventional system and predict the total cost of <br />operation and construction cost over a period of time, and <br />then you take the alternatives and look at it the same way. <br />And the 'bottom line comes out the most cost effective way <br />and that's what you're doing. <br />MIR. FRAILS: Okay. <br />Y.P. *"TINKSGAApP: I will say this, sir. I will add <br />that the vacuum system, as T indicated, was looked at. <br />However, though, that was not done on a detailed basis <br />because we did not feel comfortable in recommending that <br />from a reliability standpoint on a long term basis. So <br />those kinds of considerations are taken into account to make <br />sure that the system that you are going to get is reliable, <br />and we would not recommend it if it wasn't going to he. <br />It's just to get three hundred sixty pumrs to work instead <br />of four or five numn stations. <br />r -'R. FRATT.S: That's a big difference. <br />ZAYRATARn f, ASSOCTATFS <br />A Computer Assisted Transcript <br />(305)569-0910 <br />