Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />L 2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />S <br />7 <br />g <br />' <br />9 <br />10 <br />' <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />' <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />' <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />Z7 <br />A'R. �ft?KKSCAAP.P: Okay. Ouestion over here. <br />VP. FAVAIO'P: The name is Hammond, 1520 3rd <br />Court . <br />May I ask how it's been determined that there is a <br />problem in RockrieRe with sewage? <br />�`R. 111TNYSCAARP: I will address that puestion, <br />sir, in a 'general regard. As Part of the report, we 0,id go <br />out and take some samples out in the canals, Looked for <br />levels of chloroform, fecal strep, the various different <br />types. The sampling that we did perform was inconclusive. <br />We did not find levels of contamination based on the limited <br />amount of sampling that we'd done that we could conclusively <br />say without a shadow of a doubt that, uh-huh, it's pollution <br />right there and that's the source. I'm not going to say <br />that today because we didn't find that to be true. <br />It was a one-time sampling, though. As we talked <br />abort earlier, I'm sure that if we strategized our sampling <br />based on rainfall event and ground water tabling and went <br />maybe not to the canals but maybe some other location on the <br />site, we might be able to find that pollution. That was not <br />the intent of the study, was to determine whether or not, in <br />fact, there was pollution or there wasn't pollution. That <br />was not the scope of the project. <br />The scope of the project that our firm's involved <br />with and the ('ounty retained us for was to demonstrate tinder <br />ZAP+RATAPO 8 ASS(?CIATFS <br />A Computer Assisted Transcript <br />(305)569-n9lo <br />