My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-190
CBCC
>
Resolutions
>
2000's
>
2006
>
2006-190
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2015 6:06:05 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 4:44:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Mr. YVolfe's comments are inaudible. <br /> Mr. Drummond asked as part of the interlocal agreement, it would be determined how the matched <br /> dollars are shared. <br /> Ms. Miller's comments are inaudible. <br /> Commissioner DiTerlizzi asked about the requirements of the TRIP dollars regional significance. <br /> Mr. Wolfe's comments are inaudible. <br /> Commissioner DiTerlizzi asked if the requirements for the TRIP dollars are that they are of regional <br /> significance. <br /> dr. Wolfe's response was inaudible. <br /> Commissioner DiTerlizzi asked would it be interconnections. If projects were given that are not <br /> intercounty connected, would the projects be dropped off the list versus inter-county projects? <br /> Mr. Wolfe's response was inaudible. <br /> Commissioner DiTerlizzi stated his.concern would'be if a road was widen east/west in individual <br /> communities and was capacity related it may not meet the criteria but if it was agreed to be put on <br /> the list,FDOT would not deny it. <br /> Mr. Wolfe's response was inaudible. <br /> Commissioner DiTerlizzi asked if the projects the three counties have listed meet the criteria. <br /> Mr. Wolfe's response was inaudible. <br /> Commissioner DiTerlizzi stated good, great. <br /> Mr. Drummond asked if the Future Research Highway was staff's recommendation. <br /> Ms. Perrotta's response was inaudible. <br /> Commissioner Craft stated his concern regarding the Future Research Highway. He does not think <br /> the St. Lucie MPO Board has had a lot of discussion regarding it and nor has the St. Lucie County <br /> Board of County Commission really looked at this. Actually, the discussion of the St. Lucie BOCC <br /> had been kind of in a reverse direction. The Board is not fond of this particular highway; because it <br /> encourages more sprawls that what is being experienced. If this is something that has made a list,it <br /> needs to go back to the respective Boards and be discussed in detail. <br /> Mr. Matson'response was inaudible. <br /> TCTC Meeting minutes <br /> 05.18.06 <br /> Page 5 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.