My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/29/1975
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1975
>
1/29/1975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2024 9:58:55 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 3:38:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/29/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />THE BOARD THANKED THE VERO BEACH CIVIC ASSOCIATION AND THE CHAMBER <br />OF COMMERCE FOR THE WORK THEY HAVE DONE. <br />THE CHAIRMAN STATED THAT THE BOARD WILL AWAIT THE CHAMBERS REPORT <br />AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND THEN A WORKSHOP WILL BE SCHEDULED TO DISCUSS <br />THE DETAILS MORE THOROUGHLY, <br />ATTORNEY BURCH LEFT THE MEETING. <br />THE BOARD DISCUSSED AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA <br />REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL AND THE VERO.BEACH INDIAN RIVER COUNTY <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGARDING THE STATE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT <br />PROGRAM. A CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE IS TO BE ORGANIZED TO <br />REPRESENT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY ON COASTAL ZONE PLANNING. <br />_ I <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT WAS OPPOSED TO APPOINTING A COMMITTEE AND <br />STRONGLY OBJECTED TO ARTICLE 11 OF THE AGREEMENT. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER STATED THAT HE WOULD GO ALONG WITH ARTICLE <br />11, BUT IT WOULD BE UNDER PROTEST. <br />CHAIRMAN LOY QUESTIONED WHERE THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA PLANNING <br />COUNCIL GOT THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY TO CREATE AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br />AND STATED THAT SHE WOULD ASK THAT QUESTION OF THE INDIAN RIVER. COUNTY <br />LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION AT THEIR MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 31, 1975.. <br />JACK HOCKMAN, COUNTY FINANCE OFFICER GAVE A STATUS REPORT ON STATE <br />REVENUE SHARING. HE STATED THAT AT BUDGET TIME, STATE REVENUE SHARING <br />WAS INCLUDED IN OUR BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $348,000.00, WHICH WAS <br />DIVIDED INTO THREE FUNDS AS FOLLOWS: <br />$252,000.00.- ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND <br />48,000.00 - GENERAL FUND <br />48,000.00 - FINE AND FORFEITURE FUND. <br />AT THAT TIME THE STATE PROJECTED THE COUNTY'S SHARE TO BE <br />APPROXIMATELY $390,000.000, BUT NOW THE STATE HAS REVISED ITS <br />PROJECTION AND WE CAN EXPECT TO BE, AT BEST $108,000.00 SHORT AND <br />AT THE WORST $128,000.00 SHORT. <br />MR. HOCKMAN STATED THAT STATE REVENUE SHARING FUNDS ARE COMPRISED <br />OF CIGARETTE TAX) AUTOMOBILE ROAD TAX; AND INTANGIBLE TAXES. INTANGIBLE <br />TAXES ARE DOWN WHICH ACCOUNTS FOR THE DROP IN STATE REVENUE SHARING. <br />-6- <br />klAk 2-a-1?75 <br />BOOK 22 2.A 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.