Laserfiche WebLink
IT TO THE MORRILL BROTHERS WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE BOARD, THEY ARE <br />IN VIOLATION, AND THEY WILL HAVE A CERTAIN PERIOD OF TIME TO CORRECT <br />THIS. THE BOARD,AT THE APRIL 9TH, 1975 MEETING,DENIED THE RECUEST FROM <br />MORRILL BROTHERS TO HAVE THIS FRANCHISE TRANSFERRED TO THEM. ATTORNEY <br />BURCH INFORMED CHADWICK AND DORTON THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD TO <br />CONSIDERED WHETHER OR NOT ANDY'S SANITATION'S FRANCHISE SHOULD BE <br />TERMINATED. <br />CHAIRMAN LOY QUESTIONED A PORTION OF THE EXISTING <br />FRANCHISE THAT LIMITS THE NUMBER OF FRANCHISES AVAILABLE IN THIS <br />COUNTY. <br />THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT PHRASE HAS BEEN <br />REMOVED FROM THE FRANCHISE. IT IS A NONEXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE FOR THE <br />COUNTY. <br />A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, THE CHAIRMAN <br />AND THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO SET A TIME FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR HARRIS <br />SANITATION REGARDING THEIR APPLICATION FOR A FRANCHISE, SUBJECT TO THE <br />ATTORNEY CLEARING UP ALL QUESTIONS REGARDING THE EXISTING FRANCHISE. <br />THE BOARD AGREED THAT THE INTENTION OF THE MOTION IS THAT <br />IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS IN THE EXISTING FRANCHISE, IT WILL GIVE THE <br />ATTORNEY LATITUDE IN DECIDING WHEN TO SET THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br />THERE IS A PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED REGARDING WHETHER OR NOT <br />TO TERMINATE ANDY'S SANITATION FRANCHISE. ONCE THE ATTORNEY IS SATISFIED <br />WITH THE TERMINOLOGY IN THE FRANCHISE ITSELF HE CAN ADVERTISE FOR A <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON THE APPLICATION FOR A FRANCHISE BY HARRIS SANITATION. <br />THE MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT AND THE <br />SECONDED WAS WITHDRAWN BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE INFORMED THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR OF <br />INFORMATION HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE BEFORE HARRIS SANITATION APPEARS AT <br />THEIR PUBLIC HEARING FOR A GARBAGE FRANCHISE. <br />1. FINANCIAL FIGURES FROM THE PARENT COMPANY <br />2. INFORMATION REGARDING ANY LITIGATION THEY OR THE PARENT COMPANY MAY <br />HAVE BEEN INVOLVED WITH DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS. <br />3. INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE PARENT COMPANY AND THEIR HOLDINGS <br />4. A LIST OF THEIR AREAS OF OPERATION IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA <br />5. INFORMATION REGARDING TRANSFER FEES PAID TO THE PARENT COMPANY <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE SUGGESTED THAT THE FOLLOWING BE INCLUDED <br />11 <br />`ooK 23 PAGE 11 <br />