Laserfiche WebLink
ON PAGES 11, 12, AND 13, THE WORDS "GROSS ACRES" NEED CLARI- <br />FICATION. <br />ON PAGE 12, PARAGRAPH J - SOMETHING IS MISSING, <br />ON PAGES 12 AND 13, PARAGRAPH K TOO MANY OPEN SPACES AND TOO <br />MANY EXCEPTIONS, <br />ON PAGE 14 - REGARDING SET -BACKS, MR, KRAMER STATED THAT IF <br />ADLEY AND ASSOCIATES RECOMMENDATIONS WERE FOLLOWED, THERE WOULD BE SETBACKS <br />REQUIRED, <br />MR, KRAMER SUGGESTED FURTHER THAT THERE SHOULD BE SOME PROVISIONS <br />IN THIS ORDINANCE FOR AMENDMENTS AND CHANGES, THERE ARE NONE; THERE SHOULD <br />BE SOME PROVISIONS BOR SEPARATE BUILDING, THERE ARE NONE; THERE -SHOULD BE <br />SOME PROVISIONS FOR PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS, THERE ARE NONE; AND THERE <br />SHOULD BE AN EFFECTIVE DATE, THERE IS NONE. HE EXPECTED AFTER THE WORK- <br />SHOP IN DECEMBER THERE WOULD BE ANOTHER WORKSHOP AND FELT THAT THIS ISNOT <br />THE RIGHT TIME FOR A PUBLIC HEARING . HE SAID WE WOULD URGE YOU VERY <br />STRONGLY TO TREAT THIS AS A WORKSHOP AND CONTINUE THIS PUBLIC HEARING IN <br />ORDER TO CONSIDER THESE SUGGESTED CHANGES, WE FURTHER ASK YOU TO INQUIRE <br />OF YOUR PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE AMENDMENTS OR CHANGES PROPOSED TO YOUR <br />EXISTING ORDINANCE BY ADLEY AND ASSOCIATES IN LINE WITH THEIR TECHNICAL <br />MEMORANDUM OF JUNE, 1973. THE CIVIC ASSOCIATION BACK IN 1969, ALTHOUGH <br />CHARACTERIZED AS BEING OPPOSED TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IN CONCEPT, HAS <br />ACTUALLY ONLY BEEN OPPOSED TO THE MODE AND FORM IN WHICH IT HAS BEEN <br />PRESENTED, P.U.D. AS A CONCEPT FOR SOME FLEXIBILITY AND A MEANS OF CON- <br />TROLLING GROWTH IS ACCEPTABLE IN THE UNINCORPORATED PORTIONS OF THE COUNTY <br />AND IN THE CITY TO THE CIVIC ASSOCIATION, PROVIDED IT IS PROPERLY DRAFTED <br />AND IT INCORPORATES THE EXISTING CONTROLS AND DOES NOT CIRCUMVENT THEM, <br />HEPBURN WALKER APPEARED AND STATED THAT THE CONCEPT IS <br />BASICALLY FINE, AND THE ONLY THING THAT CONCERNS HIM IS THE MINIMUM AREA, <br />HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOME MINIMUM AREA, FORTY ACRES HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED <br />FOR A REGULAR P.U.D., BUT NO ACREAGE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR A RESIDENTIAL <br />P.U.D. HE SUGGESTED A MINIMUM OF 20 ACRES OR 10 ACRES AS 40 ACRES IS TOO <br />LARGE, THERE SHOULD BE SOME ACREAGE LIMITATIONS. <br />DON WILCOX, 635 36TH AVENUE, APPEARED AND STATED THAT HE WAS IN <br />FAVOR OF THE P.U.D. ORDINANCE AND FELT THAT BASICALLY THIS ORDINANCE WOULD <br />SERVE WELL, HE STATED THAT ONE SERIOUS PROBLEM HE CAN FORESEE IS THAT IT <br />33 <br />JUN 181975 <br />s �n� 23 <br />,, <br />100 <br />