6/18/1975 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REQUIRES CONSIDERABLE EXPENSE TO THE DEVELOPER TO GO THROUGH ALL THE STAGES REQUIRED WHICH WOULD BRING IT TO A POINT FOR THIS BOARD TO APPROVE OR DENY IT, HE WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT THE BOARD THINK OF A DIFFERENT APPROACH, HE SUGGESTED A DEVELOPER COMING IN WITH THE PRELIMINARY BASICS THAT WOULD SHOW HIS CONCEPT OF THE PLAN AND HIS DENSITY, ANSWER ANY QUES- TIONS ON WHAT HE PLANS TO DO WITH THE PROPERTY, AND AT THAT TIME GIVE HIM ANSWERS IN ORDER TO SAVE THE DEVELOPER MONEY AND ALSO THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT'S MONEY AND. TIME, IF THE BOARD GIVES TENTATIVE APPROVAL AND THE DEVELOPER COMPLETES ALL THE REQUIREMENTS, HE CAN THEN COME BACK FOR FINAL APPROVAL, CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED MR, WILCOX IF HE HAD MADE THIS SUGGESTION TO THE ZONING COMMISSION, AND MR, WILCOX ANSWERED THAT HE HAD, MARGE THOMAS - 3025 GOLFVIEW DRIVE, APPEARED WITH SEVERAL QUES- TIONS: ON PAGE 10 - PARAGRAPH E - MS, THOMAS QUESTIONED THAT PORTION OF THE FIFTH LINE ",,,MAY INITIATE A PETITION TO REZONE,,," STATING THAT THEY HAVE 90 DAYS AND IF IT IS NOT COMPLETE IT WILL REVERT BACK TO THE ORIGINAL ZONING, ATTORNEY BURCH STATED THAT THIS WAS TAKEN OUT BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE LAW, You CANNOT REVERT PROPERTY BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL ZONING: MS, THOMAS STATED THAT THE SENTENCE SHOULD READ ",,,SHALL INITIATE A PETITION TO REZONE,," PAGE 15 - PARAGRAPH N „SUB -PARAGRAPH 2 - A PORTION OF A SENTENCE HAS BEEN LEFT OUT,",,, AND SHALL BE EXTINGUISHED AT THE END OF A BUSINESS DAY," MR, BERG STATED THAT WE DO NOT KNOW WHAT THE END OF A BUSINESS DAY IS, MS, THOMAS STATED THAT THIS SHOULD BE IN THE ORDINANCE TO PROTECT RESIDENTIAL AREAS, As A RESIDENT OF A NEARBY P,U,D „ SHE WOULD NOT WANT THIS BESIDE HER, Ms, THOMAS STATED THAT SHE DID NOT SEE THE NEED FOR A P.U.D. ORDINANCE SINCE WE HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN, PAGE 11 - PARAGRAPH I - Ms. THOMAS QUESTIONED ARE WE NOT CREATING A NEW ORDINANCE FOR HOSPITALS AND CONVALESCENT AND DO WE NEED IT IN THIS ORDINANCE? JUN 1 8 1975 34 L 0'i r 3 , 101