Laserfiche WebLink
JUN .1$1975 <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT THIS IS WHAT WE CAN REQUIRE THEM <br />TO DO IN THIS SECTION, THE LAND WOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR THAT BUILDING, <br />MS, THOMAS STATED THAT IN THAT SAME PARAGRAPH I, SUB -PARAGRAPH A <br />IN THE OLD ORDINANCE IT WAS STATED THAT 65% OF THE GROSS AREA WAS RESIDEN- <br />TIAL AND COMMERCIAL WAS 2%, INDUSTRIAL WAS NOT INCLUDED AND NOW YOU HAVE 6` <br />MR, BERG STATED THAT ON PAGE 11 OF THE LATEST PROPOSED ORDINANCE <br />INDUSTRIAL - 6% WAS ELIMINATED, <br />THE BOARD DISCUSSED PAGE 11, PARAGRAPH I, AND IT WAS THE DECISI <br />OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR THAT THE HEADING SHOULD BE "MAXIMUM AREA LIMITA- <br />TIONS" AND THE THIRD LINE THE WORD "MINIMUM" BE CHANGED TO "MAXIMUM," <br />MS, THOMAS STATED THAT ON PAGE 7 THE AFFECT ON TRAFFIC PATTERN <br />HAS BEEN OMITTED, <br />MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT IT IS ON PAGE 7, PARAGRAPH D. <br />DALE PATCHETT, CITY -COUNTY URBAN FORESTER, APPEARED AND STATED <br />THAT HE WAS IN SUPPORT OF THE CONCEPT OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND HE <br />WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT THE MINIMUM STANDARD ESTABLISHED AT 40 ACRES BE <br />CHANGED AND HE SUGGESTED THAT WITH 20 ACRES THERE WOULD BE BETTER CONTROL, <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT THERE IS NO MINIMUM STANDARD ON <br />REQUIREMENT ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, <br />MR, PATCHETT CONTINUED THAT THERE SHOULD BE A MINIMUM SETBACK <br />ESTABLISHED FOR BUFFER ZONING TO PROTECT THE CONSERVATION AREAS, AND ON PAGI <br />9, PARAGRAPH D, REGARDING "SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE, IT IS HIS OPINION <br />THAT IN THE CASE OF A LARGE P,U,D „ A PERSON WITH ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERIENCE <br />WITH THIS COUNTY SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THIS SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE, <br />JOHN DUNIGAN STATED THAT HE HAS FOUND MANY ERRORS IN TERMINOLOGY <br />IN THIS'PROPOSED ORDINANCE, AND HE WILL CORRECT THEM AND PRESENT IT TO THE <br />BOARD, <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT MANY OF THE ITEMS PRESENTED TO- <br />DAY ARE WORTHY OF FURTHER CONSIDERATION, IT WAS HIS RECOMMENDATION THAT THI <br />BOARD SIT DOWN AND GO OVER THESE STEP BY STEP AND THEN PRESENT THE CHANGES <br />TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, • <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT) SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO CONTINUE THIS PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL <br />AUGUST 6, 1975, AT 3:00 O'CLOCK P.M. <br />THE BOARD AGREED TO SCHEDULE A WORKSHOP MEETING ON JULY 17, 1975 <br />AT 1:00 O'CLOCK, <br />MR, KRAMER REQUESTED THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT POINT OUT TO <br />THE BOARD WHY THEY DID NOT FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF ADLEY AND Assoc. <br />35 <br />��.w 23 . 102 <br />