Laserfiche WebLink
THE CHAIRMAN STATED THAT THE FOLLOWING IS BEING REQUESTED OF <br />THE BOARD: <br />1. THE BOARD SUPPORT THE FACT THAT THE MAPS, AS WE UNDERSTAND THEM, SHOULI <br />BE PREPARED LOCALLY. <br />2. THE STATE WOULD WORK WITH THE COMMITTEE IF WE UNDERTAKE TO PREPARE <br />THESE MAPS. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT IF THERE ARE MISCONCEPTIONS, <br />IT COULD BE THE STATES FAULT AND HE RESENTS THE STATE TAKING LAND AND <br />THE COUNTY HAVING NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT IT. HE EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT THE <br />RESTRICTIONS ON OUR LANDS AND THAT IT WOULD BEHOOVE THE STATE TO WORK <br />CLOSELY WITH THE COUNTY. HE AGREED THAT THERE SHOULD BE A MEETING SET <br />WITH MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE AND MR. BURNEY AND MR. MCGINNIS TO WORK <br />OUT THESE PROBLEMS. <br />THE BOARD AGREED THAT THEY WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTIONS AND WOULD <br />SUPPORT THE COMMITTEES REQUEST, BUT THEY DID FEEL IT WOULD BE ADVISABLE <br />FOR THE COMMITTEE TO MEET WITH STATE REPRESENTATIVES FIRST AND THAT THIS <br />DISCUSSION BE RESCHEDULED AS SOON AS THE COMMITTEE IS PREPARED TO MAKE <br />THEIR REPORT. <br />JAMES BEINDORF, COUNTY CONSULTING ENGINEER APPEARED TO DISCUSS <br />THE OUTCOME OF A MEETING HELD WITH OFFICIALS OF FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATIO <br />URBAN DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES, INC., CHARLES HERRING, ATTORNEY FOR URBAN <br />DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES; ATTORNEY PAUL BURCH; COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR JACK G. <br />JENNINGS AND MR. BEINDORF TO DISCUSS THE PROVISIONS WHICH SHOULD BE IN- <br />CLUDED IN A WATER PURCHASE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND URBAN DE- <br />VELOPMENT UTILITIES, THAT THE BOARD AUTHORIZED AT THEIR MAY 21, 1975 <br />MEETING. <br />MR. BEINDORF CONTINUED THAT THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE <br />•FOLLOWING PROVISIONS BE INCORPORATED IN THE CONTRACT PROPOSED BETWEEN <br />THE COUNTY AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT UTILITIES. <br />—12— <br />JUL 91975 ,n0K 23 PP -429 <br />