Laserfiche WebLink
SAJWR <br />Ms. Alma Lee Loy <br />approximately 5.3 feet. If the preceding is a correct supposition <br />of the jacks concept, then it is the position of the Corps that <br />the system cannot be considered to be a viable long-term solution <br />to the beach erosion problem occurring at Vero Beach for the <br />following reasons: <br />1. The submerged multi -pronged units would be a hazard to both <br />navigation and the bathing public. <br />2. The amount of weve energy dissipated upon the structures <br />would be minimal during normal wave conditions and ineffective during <br />severe storm conditions. <br />3.• There is the distinct possibility that the structures may <br />become"unstable and be displaced during storm conditions. <br />Effective erosion control measures are expensive. A properly <br />designed offshore breakwater of the massive reinforced concrete <br />tetrapod class could be designed and constructed to withstand the <br />breaking wave energy in the surf zone at Vero Beach. However, the <br />cost of such a structure would be substantially greater than <br />Mr. Jeeves' concept, and for that matter, most of the conceptual <br />alternatives presented at the 10 June 1975 public meeting. <br />We hope the above information will be of assistance to you. <br />Sincerely yours, <br />5 September 1975 <br />2 Incl ORS CH <br />1. Concept drawing cti� Chief, Engineering Division <br />2. Presentation to <br />County Commissioners <br />SAJWR 5 September 1975 <br />Taxpayers Association of Indian. <br />River County, Inc. <br />ATTN: Mr. Theodore Brown <br />P. 0. Box 1751 <br />Vero Beach, Florida 32960 <br />• <br />Gentlemen: <br />• <br />This is in regards to your letter of 22 August 1975 in which you re- <br />quested the following: . <br />"Please send us a copy of your evaluation study report of the 'jacks <br />system' as proposed by Mr. Jeeves, together with cost data and sources of <br />such data. <br />'Also, please send us a report, together with estimated costs and <br />time to complete, of the method(s) the Corps recommends to control beach <br />erosion in this area ... together with the reasons why for this recommen- <br />dations) and any subsequent or continuing costs, if any, after completion <br />of the first phase(s) of your recommended installation(s).° <br />First of all, it should be stated that the concept of a detached semi - <br />Submerged offshore breakwater, constructed using concrete armor units <br />(tetrapods), in lieu of rubble -mound stone, was considered in the Indian <br />River County Beach Erosion Control and Shore Protection Study. This alter- <br />native provided for the construction of seven tetrapod breakwaters plus <br />provisions for a protective sand beach 40 -feet wide extending from Jaycee <br />Beach Park south to the Riomar Country Club. :It was comparable to Concepts <br />K and L of Inclosure 1. This concept was planned using similar specifica- <br />, tions as were used to design the breakwaters and jetties mentioned on <br />page 1 of Mr. Jeeves' statement to the Indian River Board of County <br />Commissioners on 20 August 1975, (Inclosure 2). The initial estimated <br />cost amounted to approximately $18.000,000.. Because of this staggering <br />figure the concept was thought not to meet the study's planning objectives . <br />and was, therefore, not considered further. .. <br />SEP 1 0 19758001 23 PAGE291, <br />v <br />• <br />