Laserfiche WebLink
OCT 81975 <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE FEELS EACH MUNICIPALITY <br />SHOULD STATE WHAT THEY WANT IN PLANNING SERVICES FOR NEXT YEAR AND A <br />RATE SCHEDULE BE PREPARED WITH A MINIMUM RATE INCLUDED. <br />MR, BRENNAN STATED THAT THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES HAS <br />BUDGETED $5,000.00, THE CITY OF FELLSMERE $500,00, AND THE TOWN OF ORCHID <br />$250,00 FOR PLANNING, AND THIS IS NOT ENOUGH TO HIRE A STAFF PERSON, <br />HE FEELS THIS YEAR WE SHOULD GIVE THEM MINIMUM SERVICE AND GET THEIR <br />"701" APPLICATION TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. <br />CHAIRMAN LOY EXPLAINED THAT MR, BRENNAN NOW HAS TWO C.E.T,A. <br />PEOPLE, AND IF HE KNOWS HOW MUCH MONEY HE WILL HAVE, HE COULD THEN KEEP <br />ONE OF THOSE EMPLOYEES, THE C.E,T.A. PROGRAM ENDSJANUARY, 1976. <br />CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED MR. BRENNAN IF HE HAD GIVEN ANYONE A COST <br />ESTIMATE FOR SERVICES, AND "RR, BRENNAN ANSWERED THAT HE HAD NOT, <br />THE BOARD AGREED THAT IR, BRENNAN SHOULD ASK THE MUNICIPALITIES <br />WHAT THEY WANT IN SERVICES AND ESTIMATE WHAT IT WILL COST THEM, <br />AT THE SEPTEMBER 24, 1975 MEETING A PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD <br />REGARDING A ZONING CHANGE FROM A -AGRICULTURAL AND R-1 SINGLE FAMILY <br />DISTRICT TO R-1PII PERMANENT MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION DISTRICT OF A SECTION <br />OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE AREA OF ICINGS HIGHWAY AND LINDSEY ROAD, THIS • <br />PROPERTY IS OWNED BY JOHN D. COLE AND BOB HOFMANN IS THE DEVELOPER, AFTER <br />DISCUSSION, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED, AND IT WAS THE DECISION OF <br />THE BOARD TO DO MORE RESEARCH ON THIS REQUEST AND TO MAKE IT AN AGENDA <br />ITEM AT THIS MEETING. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT STEVE HENDERSON, ATTORNEY REPRE- <br />SENTING MR, HOFMANN AND 'MR. COLE WAS NOT ABLE TO BE PRESENT TODAY, BUT <br />HE HAS WRITTEN A LETTER WITH INFORMATION REGARDING WHETHER MOBILE HOMES <br />ARE TAXED AS REAL PROPERTY, HIS LETTER EXPLAINED THAT WHILE A MOBILE <br />HOME OWNER MAY HAVE THE OPTION OF PURCHASING AN"MV" TAG, WHEN THE MOBILE <br />HOME IS ATTACHED TO A PERMANENT FOUNDATION ON LAND OWNED BY THE MOBILE <br />HOME OWNER, IT IS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OPINION (74-150), THAT THE OWNER <br />AT THAT POINT HAS EXERCISED HIS OPTION TO TREAT THE MOBILE HOME AS REAL <br />PROPERTY, AT THAT POINT THE MOBILE HOME OWNER IS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN AN <br />"RP" TAG, AND THE MOBILE HOME AND LOT IS THEN TAXED AS REAL PROPERTY, <br />17 <br />., <br />ROw( 2 4 ��GE 17 <br />