11/5/1975 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 NOV 51975 ATTORNEY HENDERSON STRESSED THE FACT THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE CONSIDERED LOW COST HOUSING BECAUSE OF THE AVAILABILITY OF LONG TERM FAA, FINANCING COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED IF THE BOARD COULD APPROVE THE ZONING BUT LIMIT THEM TO FOUR UNITS PER ACRE. • ATTORNEY COLLINS SAID THIS COULD NOT BE DONE. ATTORNEY HENDERSON STATED THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT HAS TO BE SUB— DIVIDED AND WILL HAVE TO SHOW FOUR UNITS PER ACRE AT THAT TIME, HE SUG— GESTED CREATING ANOTHER ZONING CLASSIFICATION AT THIS DENSITY, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER MADE A MOTION TO REFER THIS ZONING REQUEST BACK TO THE ZONING COMMISSION TO CREATE ANOTHER R -1P9 DISTRICT WHICH WOULD RESTRICT DENSITY TO FOUR UNITS PER ACRE. MMOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. ATTORNEY HENDERSON SUGGESTED THIS REZONING REQUEST BE HELD IN ABEYANCE WHILE THE BOARD ASKS THE ZONING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATIONS ON A NEW CLASSIFICATION, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER MADE A MOTION TO TABLE THE REZONING REQUEST OF .JOHN'COLE AND BOB HOFMANN AND REQUEST THE ZONING BOARD TO ES— TABLISH A NEW R-1Pi DISTRICT WHICH WOULD HAVE A FOUR—UNIT TO THE ACRE RESTRICTION AND REQUIRE UNITS TO BE ON PERMANENT FOUNDATIONS, ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT PROCEDURALLY A MOTION TO TABLE MUST BE A SEPARATE MOTION, AND THIS 'LOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, TO REQUEST THE ZONING COMMIS— SION TO CONSIDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ADDITIONAL R-1PM CLASSIFICATION FOR DEVELOPMENTS OF LOWER DENSITY. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED HE FELT WE SHOULII REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ZONING COMMISSION TO SEE WHETHER IN THEIR JUDGMENT THERE COULD BE A MORE ADVANTAGEOUS ZONING IN THE R-1PM CLASSIFICATION AND WHETHER IT WOULD BE WORTHWHILE TO CREATE ONE. ATTORNEY HENDERSON POINTED OUT THAT IF THIS DEVELOPMENT WEREClO HAVE 7 OR 8 UNITS PER ACRE, IT WOULD BECOME A DRI AND WOULD EVENTUALLY BE REFERRED BACK TO THE BOARD, -26- BOOK ?a QE 122