My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/5/1975
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1975
>
11/5/1975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2024 10:08:27 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 4:16:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/05/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT THERE WAS ALWAYS THE POSSI- <br />BILITY OF SOME OF THE PROPERTY BEING SOLD OFF. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE MOTION, IT WAS VOTED ON AND CARRIED <br />UNANIMOUSLY. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER,SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER WODTKE, TO TABLE THE REZONING REQUEST OF JOHN COLE AND BOB HOFMANN <br />ON THE BASIS THAT THERE IS NO LEGAL WAY OF RESTRICTING THIS DEVELOPMENT <br />TO FOUR UNITS PER ACRE AS PRESENTED AS THE R-1PM ZONING REQUESTED CATEGOR- <br />ICALLY ALLOWS 8 UNITS PER ACRE, AND HE WOULD LIKE TO TRY TO ESTABLISH A <br />ZONE WHICH WOULD LEGALLY RESTRICT THIS DEVELOPMENT TO FOUR UNITS PER ACRE, <br />COMMISSIONERS SCHMUCKER AND WODTKE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION, <br />COMMISSIONERS MASSEY, SIEBERT AND CHAIRMAN LOY VOTED IN OPPOSITION, AND <br />THE MOTION WAS DENIED. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE FELT THE REZONING REQUEST <br />UNDER CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE ACTED ON AT THIS TIME AS HE DID NOT NECES- <br />SARILY FEEL THAT LIMITING IT TO FOUR UNITS PER ACRE MADE IT THAT MUCH <br />MORE DESIRABLE IN THE OVERALL PICTURE, <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />MASSEY, TO DENY THE PETITION OF JOHN D. COLE AND BOB HOFMANN FOR A RE- <br />ZONING TO R -1P'1 FOR REASONS STATED BEFORE AS TO THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE <br />OF THE LAND; THE IMPACT ON COUNTY SERVICES, WHICH HAS NOT BEEN CLARIFIED; <br />AND POTENTIAL CONFLICT WITH THE MASTER PLAN, <br />COMMISSIONERS SIEBERT, MASSEY AND CHAIRMAN LOY VOTED IN FAVOR, <br />COMMISSIONERS SCHMUCKER AND WODTKE VOTED IN OPPOSITION, AND THE MIOTION <br />TO DENY THE REZONING REQUEST WAS CARRIED, <br />THE BOARD DISCUSSED WITH VAL BRENNAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR, THE <br />IDEA OF HIRING SOMEONE TO DO AN INVENTORY OF RECREATION FACILITIES, <br />EQUIPMENT, ETC., AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY AND RESEARCH OF RECREATION PRO- <br />GRAMS, INCLUDING INVESTIGATION OF OTHER COMMUNITIES' PROGRAMS, LONG RANGE <br />PLANS, ETC, <br />MR, BRENNAII SAID IF HE HAD THE HOARD'S PERMISSION TO HIRE A MAN <br />ON A PART-TIME BASIS TO HELP PUT THIS TOGETHER AND CORRELATE IT WITH THE <br />INFORMATION THEY ALREADY HAD, HE THOYGHT HIS DEPARTMENT COULD HANDLE IT, <br />ALTHOUGH THE TIME ELEMENT MADE IT A PROBLEM, 1E SAID HE FELT MANY MEETINGS <br />WOULD BE NECESSARY AS THIS STUDY PROGRESSED TO BE SURE THEY ARE ON THE <br />RIGHT TRACK, <br />27 <br />NOV 51975 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.