My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/18/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
2/18/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:18 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 4:41:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/18/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE BOARD AGREED TO CHANGING 180 DAYS TO 30 DAYS. <br />DEWEY WALKER PRESENTED TO THE BOARD PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE <br />ORDINANCE THAT HAD BEEN WORKED OUT BY THE MINING REVIEW COMMITTEE, <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER REFERRED TO ITEM 6-B - REGARDING PUTTING UP <br />STAKES AND SUGGESTED THAT WHERE THERE IS 'AN OBVIOUS PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT <br />THAT A STAKE NOT BE REQUIRED, <br />MR. WALKER STATED THAT THE ZONING COMMISSION WILL WORK THIS OUT AND <br />SUGGESTED THE WORDING REMAIN AS IS, <br />THE BOARD DISCUSSED ITEM 6-A - CONDITIONS OF A PERMIT, <br />COMMISSIONER MASSEY QUESTIONED THAT PORTION READING "THE BANKS OF <br />CREATED WATER AREAS BY MINING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE SLOPED AT A RATIO OF <br />3:1, GRADED AND DRESSED UP," <br />ROBERT BERG, ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR, STATED THAT IN THE EVENT <br />A CHILD FELL IN THE EXCAVATION, THE WATER WOULD NOT BE TOO DEEP WITH A 3:1 <br />SLOPE, <br />COMMISSIONER MASSEY STATED THAT THE WAY THIS ITEM 6-A IS WRITTEN, <br />AN OPERATOR CAN DIG STRAIGHT DOWN UNTIL HE REACHES WATER LEVEL AND THEN HE <br />STARTS HIS 3:1 SLOPE, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THIS SHOULD BE AMENDED TO READ:, "ALL <br />BANKS OF CREATED WATER AREAS BY MINING OR EXCAVATION SHOULD BE SLOPED AT A <br />RATIO OF 3:1, GRADED AND DRESSED UP." <br />THE BOARD DISCUSSED ITEM 9 - OPERATING PERMITS. <br />i <br />THE BOARD THEN DISCUSSED ITEM 11 - BOND. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE QUESTIONED IF A PERSON HAS 100 ACRES AND PUTS UP <br />THE REQUIRED $10,000.00 BOND AND DOES NOT RESTORE THE PROPERTY ACCORDING TO <br />REQUIREMENTS, WE ONLY HAVE $10,000.00 TO RESTORE THE PROPERTY WHEREAS IF A <br />PERSON HAS 5 ACRES, HE HAS PUT UP A $5,000.00 BOND, AND IF THE PROPERTY IS <br />NOT RESTORED ACCORDING.TO REQUIREMENTS, IT CAN BE RESTORED WITH THE $5,000.00 <br />_ BOND, <br />THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR STATED THAT A PERSON COULD NOT COME IN AND <br />WORK 100 ACRES WITH A $10,000.00 BOND; HE WOULD HAVE TO WORK IN PHASES OF <br />APPROXIMATELY ZO ACRES AT A TIME, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED AMENDING THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AND IN-" <br />SERTING IN ITEM 11 .. "SHALL DIVIDE INTO PHASES NOT TO EXCEED 10 ACRES PER <br />- 33 - <br />93, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.