My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/9/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
6/9/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:19 AM
Creation date
6/9/2015 4:26:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/09/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMISSIONER WODTKE AGREED THAT IT IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY <br />AND NOTED THAT THE CITY ORIGINALLY PLACED THE POWER PLANT IN THIS <br />LOCATION AGAINST THEIR ADVISERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND WITH THE FULL <br />UNDERSTANDING THAT THE BRIDGE WOULD EVENTUALLY BE BUILT THERE AND KNEW <br />THE COSTS THAT WOULD BE INVOLVED. HE CONTINUED THAT HE FEELS IT IS <br />A SHAME THAT THE COUNTY HAS TO STEP IN, BUT WE ARE LOOKING AT A TEN <br />MILLION DOLLAR BRIDGE, AND IT SEEMS THIS IS THE ONLY WAY WE WILL EVER <br />GET IT. HE NOTED THAT THE D.O.T.WILL BE DOING THE DESIGN FOR THE RE— <br />LOCATION OF THE UTILITIES AND ASKED IF THEY WILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAKE <br />DECISIONS ON THIS RELOCATION BASED UPON ACCEPTANCE BY THE -CITY AS, <br />HE FELT THE COUNTY SHOULD BE PROTECTED. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT WE ARE RESERVING THE RIGHT TO <br />TURN DOWN ANY "CADILLAC" FIGURES AND ALSO NOTED IT WILL BE PUT UP FOR <br />BIDS. IF THE DESIGN IS TOO ELABORATE OR THE BID IS UNACCEPTABLE, <br />WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO RECONSIDER THE COUNTY IS PARTICIPATION. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED HOW SPENDING THE AMOUNT OF $390,000 <br />ON THIS RELOCATION WOULD AFFECT OUR SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS, <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ANSWERED THAT WE HAVE CURRENTLY APPROXI— <br />MATELY-$900,000 <br />PPROXI— <br />MATELY5900,000 IN A SECONDARY ROAD FUND TRUST ACCOUNT, WHICH WAS SET UP <br />IN ANTICIPATION OF THESE PROJECTS COMING UP. WE ALSO WILL HAVE ANOTHER <br />$400,000 OR BETTER COMING TO US IN THE NEXT BUDGET. IT SIMPLY MEANS THAT <br />IF YOU TAKE THIS MONEY AND USE IT, SOME PROJECT DOWN THE LINE WILL HAVE TO <br />.BE HELD UP. HE COMPLIMENTED THE BOARD`SAYING THAT IT IS DUE TO THEIR <br />CONSERVATIVE AND PRACTICAL APPROACH OVER THE YEARS THAT THIS MONEY IS NOW <br />AVAILABLE TO BE USED. HE CONTINUED THAT IT WILL NOT STOP ROAD PROGRESS, <br />BUT THERE WILL BE THAT MUCH LESS MONEY TO USE_ON OTHER PROJECTS. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SCHMUCKER TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION THAT CAME FROM THE JOINT MEETING <br />OF JUNE 4TH BETWEEN THE D.O.T. AND THE CITY OF VERO BEACH AND INDIAN <br />RIVER COUNTY OFFICIALS I.E., THAT THE RELOCATION COSTS FOR THE WATER <br />AND SEWER IN THE AMOUNT OF $200,000 AND THE ELECTRICAL IN THE AMOUNT OF <br />5 <br />5 <br />i <br />s <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE AGREED THAT IT IS NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY <br />AND NOTED THAT THE CITY ORIGINALLY PLACED THE POWER PLANT IN THIS <br />LOCATION AGAINST THEIR ADVISERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND WITH THE FULL <br />UNDERSTANDING THAT THE BRIDGE WOULD EVENTUALLY BE BUILT THERE AND KNEW <br />THE COSTS THAT WOULD BE INVOLVED. HE CONTINUED THAT HE FEELS IT IS <br />A SHAME THAT THE COUNTY HAS TO STEP IN, BUT WE ARE LOOKING AT A TEN <br />MILLION DOLLAR BRIDGE, AND IT SEEMS THIS IS THE ONLY WAY WE WILL EVER <br />GET IT. HE NOTED THAT THE D.O.T.WILL BE DOING THE DESIGN FOR THE RE— <br />LOCATION OF THE UTILITIES AND ASKED IF THEY WILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAKE <br />DECISIONS ON THIS RELOCATION BASED UPON ACCEPTANCE BY THE -CITY AS, <br />HE FELT THE COUNTY SHOULD BE PROTECTED. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT WE ARE RESERVING THE RIGHT TO <br />TURN DOWN ANY "CADILLAC" FIGURES AND ALSO NOTED IT WILL BE PUT UP FOR <br />BIDS. IF THE DESIGN IS TOO ELABORATE OR THE BID IS UNACCEPTABLE, <br />WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO RECONSIDER THE COUNTY IS PARTICIPATION. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED HOW SPENDING THE AMOUNT OF $390,000 <br />ON THIS RELOCATION WOULD AFFECT OUR SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS, <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS ANSWERED THAT WE HAVE CURRENTLY APPROXI— <br />MATELY-$900,000 <br />PPROXI— <br />MATELY5900,000 IN A SECONDARY ROAD FUND TRUST ACCOUNT, WHICH WAS SET UP <br />IN ANTICIPATION OF THESE PROJECTS COMING UP. WE ALSO WILL HAVE ANOTHER <br />$400,000 OR BETTER COMING TO US IN THE NEXT BUDGET. IT SIMPLY MEANS THAT <br />IF YOU TAKE THIS MONEY AND USE IT, SOME PROJECT DOWN THE LINE WILL HAVE TO <br />.BE HELD UP. HE COMPLIMENTED THE BOARD`SAYING THAT IT IS DUE TO THEIR <br />CONSERVATIVE AND PRACTICAL APPROACH OVER THE YEARS THAT THIS MONEY IS NOW <br />AVAILABLE TO BE USED. HE CONTINUED THAT IT WILL NOT STOP ROAD PROGRESS, <br />BUT THERE WILL BE THAT MUCH LESS MONEY TO USE_ON OTHER PROJECTS. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SCHMUCKER TO SUPPORT THE RECOMMENDATION THAT CAME FROM THE JOINT MEETING <br />OF JUNE 4TH BETWEEN THE D.O.T. AND THE CITY OF VERO BEACH AND INDIAN <br />RIVER COUNTY OFFICIALS I.E., THAT THE RELOCATION COSTS FOR THE WATER <br />AND SEWER IN THE AMOUNT OF $200,000 AND THE ELECTRICAL IN THE AMOUNT OF <br />5 <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.