My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/9/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
6/9/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:19 AM
Creation date
6/9/2015 4:26:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/09/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
$160,000 BE PAID FOR OUT OF THE COUNTY SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS, PROVIDED <br />THAT WHEN THE DESIGN WORK -COMES BACK FROM THE D.O.T. AND THE CONTRACTS <br />ARE LET, THIS FIGURETNOT EXCEED THE GENERAL AREA OF $390,000) AND TO <br />AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATOR WORKING WITH ATTORNEY COLLINS, TO NOTIFY THE <br />D.O.T. THAT THIS IS AN ACCEPTABLE APPROACH. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE FEELS THERE IS SOME LIABILITY <br />FOR THE CITY OF VERO BEACH TO SHARE AT LEAST PART OF THE COST, ESPECIALLY <br />SINCE THE UTILITIES ARE A PROFIT-MAKING VENTURE, HE CONTINUED THAT HE <br />-CANNOT FEEL IT IS THE COUNTY'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PAY 100% OF THE COST <br />OF THE RELOCATION, ALTHOUGH HE DOES NOT WANT TO JEOPARDIZE THE BRIDGE. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER NOTED THAT HE AGREED, BUT FELT WE WANT <br />TO SEE.THIS MATTER SETTLED. - <br />COMMISSIONER MASSEY POINTED OUT THAT FOR YEARS THE CITY OF <br />VERO BEACH HAS BEEN CHARGING EXCESS FEES FOR UTILITIES OUTSIDE CITY <br />LIMITS AND NOW THEY WANT THESE SAME PEOPLE TO PAY FOR MOVING THEIR LINES, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT LEGALLY THE CITY'S STAND IS THAT <br />THEY NEED TO BE COMPENSATED FOR THE CORRIDOR, AND THEY ARE NOW GIVING UP <br />ON THAT POSITION TO FURTHER ALONG THE BRIDGE SO'THERE IS ACTUALLY SOME <br />GIVE AND TAKE ON EACH SIDE. <br />.., - <br />COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT THIS BOARD HAS ALWAYS DONE EVERY- <br />THING THEY CAN TO FURTHER THE BRIDGE. WE MUST HAVE A BRIDGE, AND SHE <br />FEELS THAT THE CHAIRMAN, ADMINISTRATOR AND ATTORNEY COLLINS HAVE COME <br />BACK WITH AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION AND WE SHOULD SUPPORT IT. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE AGREED THAT IT IS A BREAKTHROUGH, BUT <br />STATED HE WILL VOTE AGAINST THE MOTION BECAUSE HE CANNOT AGREE ABOUT <br />ASSUMING 100% OF THE COST EVEN -'THOUGH HE AGREES WE MUST HAVE A BRIDGE. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS STATED THAT HE PERSONALLY SYMPATHIZED <br />WITH COMMISSIONER WODTKE'S VIEWS, BUT WHEN YOU REFLECT THAT A TEN MILLION <br />DOLLAR BRIDGE IS AT STAKE, THE AMOUNT OF MONEY WE ARE DISCUSSING BOILS <br />i'.{ DOWN TO A SMALLER CONSIDERATION. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.