Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER..MASSEY, THAT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY GRANT A 30,000 G.P.D. SEWER ALLOCA- <br />TION TO MEL SEMBLER & ASSOCIATES PURSUANT TO THE TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT, CON- <br />DITIONED UPON THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY REACHING AN AGREEMENT AS TO <br />SPECIFIC TERMS; THE SEWER ALLOCATION TO BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR A PERIOD OF <br />TWO YEARS FROM THE SIGNING OF THE CONTRACT, AND, IN PRINCIPLE, THE CONTRACT <br />WILL INCLUDE CERTAIN REPRESENTATIONS THAT THE DEVELOPER HAS MADE Tr� THE <br />BOARD, <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE DID NOT LIKE TO TIE IT TO A <br />TWO-YEAR PERIOD, AND MADE A MOTION, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Loy, TO AMEND <br />THE ABOVE STATED MOTION BY STRIKING OUT THE WORDS "TWO YEARS FROM THE SIGN- <br />ING OF THE CONTRACT" AND INSERTING IN THEIR PLACE aONE YEAR FROM THE SIGN- <br />ING OF THE CONTRACT." <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION ON THE AMENDMENT. COMMIS- <br />SIONERS WODTKE AND Loy VOTED IN FAVOR. COMMISSIONERS SCHMUCKER, MASSEY, AND <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT, VOTED IN OPPOSITION. THE AMENDMENT FAILED. <br />AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER WITHDREW HIS <br />MOTION AND COMMISSIONER MASSEY WITHDREW HIS SECOND. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED THAT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY GRANT A <br />30,000 G.P.D. SEWER ALLOCATION TO MEL SEMBLER & .ASSOCIATES PURSUANT TO THE <br />TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT, CONDITIONED UPON THE DEVELOPER AND THE COUNTY REACHING <br />AN AGREEMENT AS TO SPECIFIC TERMS; THE SEWER ALLOCATION TO BE MADE AVAILABLE <br />FOR A PERIOD OF 18 MONTHS FROM THE SIGNING OF THE CONTRACT, AND, IN PRIN- <br />CIPLE, THE CONTRACT WILL INCLUDE CERTAIN REPRESENTATIONS THAT THE DEVELOPER <br />HAS MADE TO THE BOARD. <br />THE BOARD THEREUPON RECESSED FOR LUNCH AT 12:00 O'CLOCK ."SOON AND <br />RECONVENED AT 1:115 O'CLOCK P.M. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS DONE SOME RESEARCH <br />IN REGARD TO ISSUING A FRANCHISE TO C & J AMBULANCE TRANSFER SERVICE, INC., <br />AND HAS FOUND NO SPECIFIC AUTHORITY TO ISSUE A FRANCHISE TO AN AMBULANCE <br />SERVICE. HE, THEREFORE, FEELS THAT A CERTIFICATE OF NEED FROM THE COUNTY <br />IS ALL THAT IIS REQUIRED. THE ATTORNEY STATED THAT HE HAS DRAFTED SUCH A <br />CERTIFICATE BASED ON WHAT WAS ISSUED IN OTHER COUNTIES AND HAS RECEIVED A <br />LETTER FROM C & J AMBULANCE TRANSFER SERVICE, INC., SETTING OUT THEIR RATES <br />FOR MARTIN AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES AND STATING THE SAME RATES WILL APPLY TO <br />21hot <br />y. <br />24 <br />