8/4/1976 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I MR. SEMBLER SAID THAT IT WAS, AND THE COUNTY WOULD HAVE NO FI- NANCIAL INVESTMENT. CHAIRMAN SIEBERT SUGGESTED WRITING AN AGREEMENT TO GRANT THE SEWER ALLOCATION FOR A GIVEN TIME AFTER WHICH IT WOULD REVERT BACK TO THE COUNTY. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO METHODS OF METER READING AND BILLING OF THE COUNTY BY THE CITY, AND MR, SEMBLER STATED THAT POSSIBLY THAT MIGHT HAVE TO BOND OR PROTECT THE COUNTY IN SOME WAY, COMMISSIONER WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT MR. SEMBLER WOULD UNDOUBTEDLY BE BILLING HIS TENANTS FOR A PROPORTIONATE AMOUNT OF THE SEWER BILL, AND Ic S0, FELT HE WOULD HAVE TO HAVE A FRANCHISE. DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO WHETHER A FRANCHISE WOULD BE REQUIRED IN SUCH A SITUATION. IT WAS NOTED THAT CONDOMINIUMS ARE NOT RE- QUIRED TO HAVE A FRANCHISE, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE WOULD HAVE TO RESEARCH THIS QUESTION. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMIS- SIONER MASSEY, THAT A 30,000 G,P.D. SEWER ALLOCATION BE GRANTED TO MEL SEMBLER & ASSOCIATES, SUBJECT TO WORKING OUT NECESSARY DETAILS RE A FRAN- CHISE, WITH A TWO-YEAR TIME PERIOD TO OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT. IN DISCUSSION IT WAS GENERALLY FELT THE MOTION WAS VERY BROAD. ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED GIVING THE DEVELOPER AN OPTION FSR THE 30,000 G.P.D. SEWER ALLOCATION FOR A SET PERIOD OF TIME CONDITIONED UPON HIS DOING WHATEVER THE BOARD THINKS IS NECESSARY, SIR, SEMBLER NOTED THAT HE HAS A ONE-YEAR OPTION ON THE PROPERTY AND MAY HAVE TO RENEW IT, DISCUSSION CONTINUED IN REGARD TO MAKING THE ALLOCATION FOR ONE YEAR SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT TO BE WORKED OUT BETWEEN OUR ATTORNEY, THE ADMINISTRATOR AND THE PRINCIPALS INVOLVED, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER FELT A TWO-YEAR PERIOD WOULD BE MORE REA- SONABLE, AND COMMISSIONER MASSEY SUGGESTED INCLUDING AN EXTENSION OF TIME PROVIDING CERTAIN THINGS ARE DONE, COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER WITHDREW.HIS MOTION AND COMMISSIONER MASSEY WITHDREW HIS'SECOND, 20 AUG 4.1976