My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/18/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
8/18/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:19 AM
Creation date
6/9/2015 4:36:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. ADAMS STATED THAT THE SCHEDULE HAS ALREADY BEEN TURNED OVER <br />TO-THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAW UP AN.ORDINANCE. <br />COMMISSIONER L.OY NOTED THAT THE COUNTY IS OPERATING ALL RIGHT � <br />i <br />ON THE PRESENT VOLUME. SHE POINTED OUT THAT WE ADJUSTED OUR FEE SCHEDULE ` <br />ONLY SIX MONTHS AGO TO TRY TO HANDLE THE SITUATION AND FELT WE SHOULD STAY <br />i <br />WITH THE SITUATION WE HAVE RIGHT NOW EVEN THOUGH IT MIGHT CAUSE A LITTLE <br />HARDSHIP ON THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. <br />MR. ADAMS REPLIED THAT IT WOULD CAUSE MORE THAN JUST A LITTLE <br />• i <br />HARDSHIP UNLESS THE COUNTY ADOPTED JUST APPENDIX M, AND IN THAT EVENT, HE <br />WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY ALSO ADOPT ONLY APPENDIX M IN ORDER TO KEEP <br />THE SAME SET OF STANDARDS FOR THE CITY AND COUNTY, <br />COMMISSIONER MASSEY NOTED THAT IN THE LAST FEW YEARS MR, ADAMS <br />HAS REPORTED THAT THEY HAVE EXCESS FUNDS, EVEN THOUGH THESE FUNDS DO HAVE <br />TO GO INTO THE GENERAL FUND. <br />•VICE CHAIRMAN WODTKE POINTED OUT THAT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE <br />COUNTY ARE MUCH DIFFERENT THAN THOSE OF THE CITY, AND EVEN THOUGH THE COUNTY <br />MIGHT HAVE LIKED TO TAKE THE EXCESS FUNDS IN THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND PUT <br />THEM INTO THE CONTINGENCY FUND, THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DO THIS. HE CON- <br />TINUED THAT HE FELT SURE THE BOARD WILL HAVE A WAY TO ADDRESS THE NEED FOR <br />THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH ARE LOOKED AT EACH YEAR ON A REQUEST BASIS, <br />AND STATED HE DID NOT FEEL WE SHOULD AGAIN REVISE OUR SCHEDULE JUST TO <br />ACCOMMODATE THE CITY'S POSITION. HE ALSO NOTED THAT IT SEEMS WE ARE GETTING <br />CLOSER AND CLOSER.TO A NEED TO HAVE A COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT, <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED TO TAKE NO ACTION TODAY AND <br />.TO HOLD THIS MATTER IN ABEYANCE, <br />MRS. BEULAH LAW APPEARED TO PROTEST THE CLOSING OF AMBERSAND <br />BEACH PARK WEST OF AlA AND STATED THAT BY SO DOING, THE COUNTY HAS PUSHED <br />PEOPLE OFF ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY. SHE ALSO STATED THAT SHE, JOHN RULE AND <br />MRS. L.UTZ, WERE DEFINITELY OPPOSED TO AN EXCHANGE OF RIVERFRONT PROPERTY <br />FOR .00EANFRONT PROPERTY IN THAT AREA, <br />COMMISSIONER MASSEY INFORMED MRS. LUTZ THAT WHAT WE ARE CONSIDERING <br />IS POSSIBLY SWAPPING THE RIVERFRONT PORTION OF THE PARK TO THE ADJACENT <br />OWNER TO THE SOUTH OF THE PARK FOR HIS OCEANFRONT PROPERTY SOUTH OF THE PARK. <br />Yom' <br />AUG 181.976 } <br />10 <br />ate 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.