My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/18/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
8/18/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:19 AM
Creation date
6/9/2015 4:36:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/18/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
meq.• ' <br />, <br />It was therefore determined by the committee that if Mr. Jenkins was <br />to continue any mining on the property in question that several things would <br />have to be done, -as follows;, <br />%. Area to be mined should be rezoned to Agricultural. <br />2. Area in violation to be backfilled. <br />.3. Plans submitted to show final layout of land for future <br />i <br />development before any further activity would be permitted. <br />4. Submit to County Administrator bond to assure backfilling. <br />As an alternate, the land could remain in an Industrial zone (Master <br />Plan shows industrial use). It is in a prime location, near railroad, and <br />could be developed into an industrial park. Therefore, there is no question ' <br />i <br />of depriving him of use of his land. Mr. Jenkins could sell or lease any <br />part or all of the industrial land, which could be profitable. Note: Any <br />required filling of the land for industrial purposes would not be considered <br />to be a mining operation, as long as the fill remains on the land owned by <br />Mr. Jenkins. <br />It should also be noted that the committee was sympathetic to Mr. <br />Jenkins' dilemna, but it should be pointed out that he apparently, either in <br />ignorance, disregard for, or purposely continued to violate the ordinances <br />in his operations. As a consequence, the committee cannot make any other <br />.recommendations than it has, because it is felt that a precedence would be <br />established that would, in effect, nullify the intent and purpose of the ° <br />Mining Ordinance. i <br />RMB: jm <br />.8/5/76 <br />AUG 18197G <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.