My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/18/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
8/18/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:19 AM
Creation date
6/9/2015 4:36:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/18/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />0 <br />VICE CHAIRMAN WODTKE INQUIRED AS TO THE LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION <br />THAT MIGHT BE EXPECTED FROM THE COUNTY ON A COST BASIS. <br />SUPERINTENDENT MCCLURE SAID THIS HAD NOT BEEN DISCUSSED EXCEPT <br />AS TO THE POSSIBILITY OF USING SECONDARY ROAD FUNDS, <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS SAID THAT HE HAD NO COST ESTIMATES SO FAR, <br />HE AGAIN NOTED THAT, ALTHOUGH THIS IS A PRIMARY ROAD, THE STATE. SEEMS AGREE— <br />ABLE TO TRY TO WORK WITH EVERYBODY ON THIS AND HAVE INDICATED THAT SECONDARY <br />ROAD FUNDS COULD BE USED ON THIS PROJECT. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY ASKED IF THE SCHOOL BOARD COULD POSSIBLY SPLIT <br />THE COST ON A 50/50 BASIS. <br />SUPERINTENDENT MCCLURE STATED THAT HE FELT THE SCHOOL BOARD WOULD <br />BE RECEPTIVE TO WHATEVER THE COUNTY THINKS IS FAIR AND JUST. <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR STATED HE HAD NO WAY TO FIGURE THE COST AT THIS <br />TIMEp BUT POINTED OUT THAT THE COUNTY COULD DO IT FOR LESS MONEY THAN IF <br />IT WENT THROUGH B.C,Ta CHANNELS. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE ROAD WILL HAVE TO <br />BE BUILT TO PRIMARY ROAD SPECIFICATIONS, BUT ALSO NOTED THAT IT WILL BE <br />GIVEN BACK TO US SOME DAY, <br />VICE CHAIRMAN WODTKE INFORMED SUPERINTENDENT MCCLURE THAT HE WOULD <br />LIKE THE SCHOOL BOARD TO UNDERSTAND THAT WE DO APPROVE THE D A T.'S RECOM— <br />MENDATIONS AND WILL PARTICIPATE WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD; WE HAVE MENTIONED <br />i <br />THE POSSIBILITY OF 50/50 PARTICIPATION, BUT UNTIL THE ADMINISTRATOR CAN <br />i <br />CHECK OUT COSTS AND GET US SOME FIGURES, WE CANNOT BE MORE SPECIFIC. HE <br />NOTED THAT THE COUNTY HAS IN THE PAST COOPERATED WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD AND <br />THOROUGHLY INTENDS TO PARTICIPATE WITH THEM ON THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT, <br />i <br />SUPERINTENDENT MCCLURE REPLIED THAT HE WOULD RELAY THIS INFORMA— <br />TION TO THE SCHOOL BOARD, AND AFTER THE DAT, AND THE ADMINISTRATOR DETER— <br />MINE THE COST, WILL PRESENT IT TO THE SCHOOL BOARD AND FEELS THEY WILL PAR— <br />TICIPATE ON A 50/50 BASIS. <br />VICE CHAIRMAN WODTKE NEXT DISCUSSED A LETTER RECEIVED BY THE <br />i <br />ADMINISTRATOR LAST FRIDAY FROM THE SCHOOL BOARD REQUESTING THAT THE COUNTY <br />r <br />TRANSPORT NEW FIRE ESCAPES TO THE FELLSMERE SCHOOL AND HAVE A COUNTY CRANE <br />AT'THE SCHOOL SITE TO HELP WITH THE •INSTALLATION. <br />tp > <br />oar 39 <br />rte , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.