My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/18/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
8/18/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:19 AM
Creation date
6/9/2015 4:36:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/18/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
y.d <br />ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT DUE TO THE EMER— <br />GENCY NATURE OF THIS REQUEST AND THE FACT THAT THESE FIRE ESCAPES HAD TO BE <br />TRANSPORTED ON MONDAY, AUGUST 16TH, THE MATTER HAD ALREADY BEEN TAKEN CARE OF. <br />a <br />SUPERINTENDENT MCCLURE STATED THAT THE SCHOOL BOARD WILL BE GLAD <br />TO REPAY THE COUNTY FOR THEIR EXPENSE. <br />DON ADAMS, CITY—COUNTY BUILDING DIRECTOR, APPEARED IN REGARD TO <br />A PROPOSED NEW FEE SCHEDULE. HE NOTED THAT THE REVISED FEE SCHEDULE WHICH <br />I <br />WAS APPROVED BY THE COUNTY IN DECEMBER OF 1975 WAS SIMPLY A STOP—GAP <br />MEASURE TO KEEP HIS DEPARTMENT FROM GOING INTO THE RED. MR. ADAMS STATED <br />THAT HE AND CITY MANAGER LITTLE HAD WORKED TOGETHER TO TRY AND COME UP WITH <br />A FEASIBLE FEE SCHEDULE THAT WOULD MAKE THE DEPARTMENT SELF—SUFFICIENT. <br />HE ALSO STATED THAT THE SCHEDULE HE IS ASKING THE BOARD TO ADOPT IS THE SAME <br />FEE SCHEDULE THAT IS BEING RECOMMENDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL; ALTHOUGH, THEY <br />HAVE NOT TAKEN ACTION ON IT AS YET, <br />MR. ADAMS CONTINUED THAT HE HAS STUDIED FEE SCHEDULES THROUGHOUT <br />THE COUNTRY AND THE SOUTHERN BUILDING CODES RECOMMENDED FEE SCHEDULE. HE <br />NOTED THAT FOR SEVEN YEARS THEY WENT WITHOUT ANY FEE INCREASE AT ALL, AND <br />THE LAST REVISION IN NO WAY MAKES UP FOR THE SEVEN YEAR GAP. MR, ADAMS <br />THEN PRESENTED SOME COMPARATIVE FIGURES IN REGARD TO BUILDING PERMITS, <br />STATING THAT A $20'000 TWO—BEDROOM HOUSE UNDER THE PRESENT SCHEDULE WOULD <br />HAVE FEES AMOUNTING TO $124.90, AND UNDER THE PROPOSED SCHEDULE, THEY WOULD <br />AMOUNT TO $150.40. <br />MR. ADAMS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT BECAUSE OF THE TENDENCY OF APPLI— <br />CANTS TO MINIMIZE COST OF CONSTRUCTION ON THE APPLICATION, HE HAS BROKEN <br />DOWN THE COST PER SQUARE FOOT ON BUILDINGS AND ESTABLISHED A SCHEDULE TO BE <br />USED BY HIS STAFF IN LOOKING OVER THE APPLICANT S FIGURES TO DETERMINE IF <br />THEY APPEAR TO BE OUT OF LINE. THIS IS NOT ACTUALLY A PART OF THE NEW PRO— <br />POSED SCHEDULE, BUT JUST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE USE. ON THE SPECIALTY PERMITS, <br />I.E., PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, HE RECOMMENDS A ONE—STEP INCREASE — <br />ELECTRICAL INSPECTION WOULD GO FROM $4.00 TO $5.00 FOR THE FIRST 8 OUTLETS, <br />ETC. MR. ADAMS NOTED THAT THEY HAVE TRIED TO INCREASE IN THE AREAS WHERE <br />THE MOST INSPECTIONS ARE MADE, AND STATED.THAT THEY NOT ONLY WOULD LIKE TO <br />MAKE THE DEPARTMENT SELF—SUFFICIENT, BUT WOULD LIKE TO BUILD UP A SURPLUS <br />WHEREBY THEY COULD PURCHASE CAPITAL ITEMS WITHOUT BEING A BURDEN ON THE <br />AD VALOREM TAXES. <br />8 <br />mAUG 181976 <br />PON <br />t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.