My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/3/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
11/3/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:20 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 4:30:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/03/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THAT TIME THERE HAS NOT BEEN ANY ACTUAL WORK DONE ON THIS DEVELOPMENT, <br />MR. HOWARD INFORMED THE BOARD THAT MR. CHILDERS IS MEETING WITH <br />VARIOUS BANKS TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT TO PROCEED, AND <br />HE NOTED THAT THEY DO HAVE FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER Loy, TO APPROVE AN EXTENSION OF TENTATIVE APPROVAL FOR REBEL <br />WOOD WEST SUBDIVISION FOR SIX MONTHS. <br />MR, HOWARD ASKED IF EVERYTLING WAS PRETTY WELL ALONG IN SIX <br />MONTHS` TIME, WOULD THEY BE ABLE TO GET ANOTHER EXTENSION. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED HIM THAT THE WORK IS ACTUALLY <br />SUPPOSED TO BE COMPLETED -IN SIX MONTHS, BUT FELT IF IT WERE MOSTLY <br />COMPLETED SOMETHING COULD BE WORKED OUT. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />FINANCE OFFICER HOCKMAN DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD A LIST OF ADVERSE <br />AUDIT FINDINGS FROM THE AUDIT OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE <br />YEARS 1973-74, 1974-75 P.ND STATED THAT ON A! _ OF THESE CRITICISMS THE AUDITOR MOW SAYS <br />THEY HAVE MADE TREMENDOUS PROGRESS. HE NOTED THAT THIS I,� THE MOST IN-DEPTH AUDIT THE <br />COUNTY HAS EVER HAD. HE -THEN WENT OVER THE LIST ITEM BY ITEM WITH THE BOARD. <br />MR. HOCKMAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE WILL DRAFT A WRITTEN <br />PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT OF FUNDS FOR INVESTMENT <br />PURPOSES AND GIVE IT TO ATTORNEY COLLINS TO REVIEW. HE STATED THAT HE <br />FELT WHAT THE AUDITOR REALLY WANTS IS TO FIND OUT HOW A CERTIFICATE <br />OF DEPOSIT WOULD BE PLACED, WHAT THE PROCEDURE IS FOR GETTING BIDS OR <br />QUOTES ON THEM, AND WHO THE DESIGNATED PEOPLE ARE WHO CAN DO THIS TYPE <br />OF BUSINESS FOR THE BOARD. HE STATED THAT HE WILL DESIGN A PROGRAM <br />WHERE THE FINANCE OFFICER WILL BE AUTHORIZED TO NEGOTIATE CERTIFICATES <br />OF DEPOSIT, BUT NOT AUTHORIZED TO GO INTO THE INVESTMENT TYPE OF THINGS, <br />SUCH AS TREASURY BILLS. <br />MR. HOCKMAN NEXT DISCUSSED A CENTRALIZED PURCHASING DEPARTMENT, <br />AND DID NOT FEEL THE COUNTY IS AT A STAGE WHERE SUCH A DEPARTMENT WOULD <br />JUSTIFY ALL THE EXPENSE INVOLVED (SALARIES FOR A PURCHASING OFFICER, <br />SECRETARY, SPACE, EQUIPMENT, ETC.) IN REGARD TO RECEIVING SUPPLIES <br />WITHOUT A PURCHASE ORDER,HE STATED THEY ARE NOW GETTING BILLS.RECEIPTED. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT STATED THAT HE FELT WE SHOULD IMPROVE OUR <br />0 <br />11 <br />NOV 31976 <br />to 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.