My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/4/1977
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1977
>
5/4/1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 8:41:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/04/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE SUGGESTED THAT THE COUNTY COULD PAY THE $2,500 " <br />FOR OVERGIZING AND HAVE THE LINE IN THE NAME OF THE COUNTY. MR. LITTLE <br />DID NOT FEEL THAT WOULD PRESENT ANY PROBLEM. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED WHETHER THE CITY WILL CONTINUE TO <br />HAVE A SIMILAR IMPACT FEE FOR ALL DEVELOPERS. <br />MR. LITTLE POINTED OUT THAT VERO MED AND RALMAR WERE GOING TO <br />HAVE TO SPEND MONEY ON PACKAGE PLANTS AND THEY WERE WILLING TO CONTRIBUTE <br />THIS TO THE ESCROW FUND INSTEAD. VERO MALL WAS A RECOGNITION OF THE FACT <br />THAT THERE WILL BE AN IMPACT FROM AN ELEVATED TANK BACK TO THE TREATMENT <br />PLANT. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO IMPACT <br />IF THEY RAN A LINE ALL THE WAY TO THE PLANT. <br />MR. LITTLE AGREED, BUT STATED THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO GET AWAY <br />FROM THAT AND POINTED OUT THAT THE DEVELOPER IS STILL FISCALLY BETTER OFF <br />THAN IF HE HAD TO RUN THE LINE TO THE PLANT. <br />ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS POINTED OUT TO THE.BOARD THAT THERE ARE <br />ADVANTAGES TO THE COUNTY IN HAVING THE LINE RUN DOWN 6TH AVENUE, WHICH WAS <br />ITS ORIGINAL LOCATION. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THE ROUTE OF THE SEWER LINE SHOULD BE <br />INCLUDED IN THE AGREEMENT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THERE SHOULD BE SOME WRITING BETWEEN THE <br />DEVELOPER, THE COUNTY AND THE CITY ABOUT IT BEFORE THE AGREEMENT IS SIGNED. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED HE DID NOT SEE IN THE AGREEMENT <br />WHERE THE COUNTY GETS THE LINES BACK, AND THE ATTORNEY FELT THAT THIS I <br />NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED, POSSIBLY BY AN ADDENDUM. THE ATTORNEY RECOMMENDED <br />THAT THE COUNTY -OWN THE WASTE WATER LINE AND PAY THE COST OF OVERSIZING. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT, TECHNICALLY, UNDER THE CURRENT <br />FORMULA PRESENTED BY THE CITY, WE ALREADY HAVE ALLOCATED ALL OF OUR WATER <br />AS WE STATED THAT THE BALANCE WOULD BE ALLOCATED TO THE GIFFORD AREA. <br />COMMISSTomr <br />. _ �E: LOY AGREED THAT WE MUST BE VERY CAREFUL ABOUT AUTHOR- <br />!ZING.ANY NEW SERVICE AREAS UNTIL WE HAVE A NEW AGREEMENT BECAUSE, TECHNI- <br />CALLY, WE DONT HAVE ANY WATER ALLOCATION LEFT, <br />MR. LITTLE POINTED OUT THAT IT WILL BE A LONG TIME BEFORE THE <br />HOSPITAL EVER FLOWS 500,000 GALLONS PER DAY AS THAT IS THE TOTAL ULTIMATE <br />CAPACITY WITH FOUR MORE STORIES AND SUPPORT FACILITIES.- IT ALSO WILL BE <br />14 <br />56 <br />_: P <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.