Laserfiche WebLink
MAY <br />A LONG TIME BEFORE THE NORTHERN AREA TAKES UP 700,000 GALLONS PER DAY, AND <br />;y <br />HE FELT TO SAY THE ALLOCATION IS ALL USED UP WHEN IT IS REALLY JUST SITTING <br />IN LIMBO, IS NOT RIGHT. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT THE PROBLEM DOES EXIST, HOWEVER, <br />i <br />AND MUST BE RESOLVED. i <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO ELIMINATING THE WORDS "AND/OR <br />SEWER. FROM PARAGRAPH 9 OF THE AGREEMENT AS MR. LITTLE STATED THAT THE <br />$15,000 FEE IS AIMED ONLY AT WATER LINES, <br />6 <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER DISCUSSED THE PROPOSED OVERSIZING OF THE <br />SEWER LINE FROM 4" TO 6" AND ASKED WHETHER 6" WOULD BE SUFFICIENT. <br />MR. LITTLE REVIEWED THE TECHNICALITIES INVOLVED IN REGARD TO <br />FLOW AND NOTED THAT GREATER PROBLEMS ARE SOMETIMES CAUSED BY UNDER CAPACITY <br />FLOW THAN OVER CAPACITY. IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THAT 6" WOULD BE AMPLE. <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS -AGREED THAT THE AREAS IN THE TRI— <br />PARTITE AGREEMENT THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED ARE: OWNERSHIP OF THE LINES, <br />ALLOCATION, AND OVERSIZING CAPACITY. <br />THE CHAIRMAN INSTRUCTED ATTORNEY COLLINS TO REDRAFT THE AGREE— <br />MENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY AND MR. SEMBLER, DEVELOPER OF <br />VERO MALL. <br />•COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE SENT A LETTER <br />TO THE CITY OF VERO BEACH IN REGARD TO THE PROPOSED WIDENING OF 16TH STREET <br />i <br />ASKING IF THEY WISHED TO HAVE THE COUNTY UNDERTAKE THE JOB FOR THEM AND <br />DEDUCT THE COST FROM THEIR SHARE OF THE ROAD FUND FROM THE COUNTY. <br />CITY MANAGER LITTLE STATED THAT THIS MATTER HAS NOT COME BEFORE <br />e <br />s <br />THE CITY COUNCIL AS YET, BUT THEY HAVE SOME DATA FROM THE DOT WHICH SEEMS <br />} <br />TO CONFLICT WITH INFORMATION GIVEN THE COUNTY. HE REPORTED THAT THE CITY <br />HAS BEEN INFORMED THAT ALTHOUGH 16TH STREET IS NOT A NUMBERED STATE ROAD, <br />f <br />IT IS NEVERTHELESS A STATE ROAD AND THE DOT DOES MAINTAIN IT. HE NOTED <br />THAT WHEN THE CITY PUT A WATER MAIN DOWN IT, THEY HAD TO GET A STATE PERMIT. <br />ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS EXPLAINED THAT WHEN THE CITY ASKS THE <br />gg <br />1 <br />DOT TO HAVE `-'0^:'-trONE ON THIS ROAD, THE STATE DOES IT AND CHARGES IT TO <br />i <br />TnE COUNTY. HE NOTED THAT WHETHER IT IS A STATE ROAD OR COUNTY ROAD CAN <br />BE CLEARED UP, BUT POINTED OUT THAT THE COUNTY CAN DO WORK ON THIS ROAD. <br />HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THE WIDENING CAN BE DONE IN THE MANNER SUGGESTED BY <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER IF THE COUNTY DOES THE WORK, BUT IF THE DOT DOES IT, <br />I <br />! 3 <br />57 <br />�a <br />r <br />41911 <br />1 <br />