Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />: IT WILL HAVE TO GO INTO CONTRACTS, ETC,- HE FELT THE ONLY PROBLEM IS <br />WHETHER THE CITY WISHES THE COUNTY TO DO THIS WORK OR NOT. <br />CITY MANAGER LITTLE STATED THAT HE PERSONALLY DID NOT FEEL THAT <br />WIDENING THE ROAD 2-1/2' WOULD ACCOMPLISH MUCH AND FELT BICYCLE PATHS <br />WOULD BE A BETTER ANSWER. a <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER POINTED OUT THAT THE SIMPLEST AND CHEAPEST <br />WAY TO MAKE AN IMPROVEMENT WOULD BE TO ADD THE 2-1/2'. HE QUESTIONED <br />WHETHER THERE WAS ROOM FOR A 6' BICYCLE PATH ALL THE WAY ALONG AND NOTED <br />THERE COULD BE A BIG RIGHT-OF-WAY PROBLEM. HE AGREED IT CERTAINLY COULD <br />BE INVESTIGATED. <br />MR. LITTLE NOTED THAT AN EXTRA 2-1/2' IS NOT ENOUGH TO MAKE IT <br />SAFE TO PASS A BICYCLE IF A CAR IS COMING IN THE OTHER DIRECTION. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT THIS HAS ALL BEEN CONSIDERED, AND <br />WE WOULD PREFER BICYCLE PATHS, BUT WERE•TRYING TO IMPROVE THE EXISTING <br />SITUATION WITHIN THE PRESENT RIGHT-OF-WAY. <br />ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS NOTED THAT THE 2-1/2' WOULD GIVE SOME <br />IMMEDIATE RELIEF, BUT GETTING ADDITIONAL RIGHTS-OF-WAY WOULD BE A LONG TERM <br />PROBLEM, <br />MR. LITTLE ASKED HOW THE APPROXIMATELY $30,000 REFERRED TO RE-, <br />LATES TO THE TOTAL COST OF THE PROJECT. <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR EXPLAINED THAT THIS AMOUNT.COVERS THE COST OF <br />THE ACTUAL MATERIALS USED (ASPHALT AND SOIL CEMENT) AND DOES NOT INCLUDE <br />THE COUNTY'S LABOR AND EQUIPMENT COSTS. <br />AFTER FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED THAT COMMISSIONER <br />SCHMUCKER WILL ATTEND THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING WITH CITY MANAGER <br />LITTLE TO EXPLAIN THE MATTER TO THE COUNCIL. <br />THE BOARD THEREUPON RECESSED AT 12:00 O'CLOCK NOON FOR LUNCH AND <br />• RECONVENED AT 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE BOARD HAD PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED <br />HIM TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST PETER SABONJOHN FOR VIOLATION OF AN ORDI- <br />NANCE, AND THE ZONING DEPARTMENT HAS INFORMED HIM THAT MR. SABONJOHN HAS <br />CREATED ANOTHER PROBLEM AND VIOLATION. HE REPORTED THAT HE WILL PROCEED <br />AGAINST MR. SABONJOHN ONCE AGAIN AS REQUESTED IN THE FOLLOWING LETTER FROM <br />THE ADMINISTRATOR AND ZONING DIRECTOR. <br />58 3 <br />MAY 4 1 <br />r <br />