My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/20/1977
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1977
>
7/20/1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 8:48:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/20/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br />THE PROPER COVERAGE, HE FELT IN ORDER TO BE GUARANTEED COVERAGE OF A <br />CERTAIN AREA, THE COUNTY WOULD HAVE TO -LET THE VENDOR TELL THEM WHAT TO <br />SPECIFY, <br />MR. MCKENNA STATED THAT THEY JUST SPECIFIED THAT THE DUPLEXER <br />AND ACCESSORY EQUIPMENT MUST BE ADEQUATE TO MEET THE 98% COVERAGE REQUIRE- <br />MENT, <br />MR. STAGGS OF AUDIOHOUSE TOOK EXCEPTION TO THE COMMENT THAT THEIR <br />EQUIPMENT IS NOT 100% SOLID STATE, NOTING THAT THEY HAD QUOTED AN ALTERNATE <br />WHICH WAS. HE ALSO CHALLENGED THE STATEMENT THAT THEIR MOBILE UNITS ARE <br />NOT "EQUAL" IN PERFORMANCE TO THE THREE ACCEPTABLE RADIOS LISTED IN THE <br />SPECIFICATIONS AND COMPLAINED THAT THE SPECIFICATIONS WERE VERY AMBIGUOUS. <br />MR, McKENNA STATED THAT IN WRITING THE SPECIFICATIONS THEY USED <br />A SYSTEM PRACTISED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS, WHICH DOES NOT <br />DETAIL EVERYTHING BUT SETS A LEVEL OF QUALITY, <br />MR. HUBER OF RCA INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HIS COMPANY QUOTED A <br />SYSTEM THEY FEEL WILL WORK, AND IF IT DOESN'T WORK, AGREED THAT THE COUNTY <br />SHOULDN'T PAY FOR IT. HE POINTED OUT THAT RCA IS A BIG ENOUGH COMPANY <br />TO BACK UP THEIR INSTALLATION. <br />MR, STAGGS OF AUDIOHOUSE DISCUSSED MAINTENANCE AND UPKEEP OF THE <br />RADIO SYSTEM, AND CLAIMED THAT RCA HAS ONLY ONE TECHNICIAN AVAILABLE WHO <br />HAS TO COME FROM QUITE A DISTANCE, <br />MR. HUBER INFORMED THE BOARD THAT RCA HAS A MANUFACTURER'S REP- <br />RESENTATIVE IN WHITE CITY, JUST ,SOUTH OF FORT"PIERCE, WHO HAS BEEN THERE <br />MANY YEARS AND WHO HAS MORE THAN ONE TECHNICIAN, THIS MAN PROVIDES SERVICE <br />TO THE MARTIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, <br />MR. MCKENNA READ FROM THE AUDIOHOUSE BID WHICH TAKES EXCEPTION <br />TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT ALL•EQUIPMENT MUST BE 100% SOLID STATE, <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS NOTED THAT EVALUATING A BID OF THIS TYPE <br />IS COMPLICATED AND MANY MINOR DETAILS ARISE. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE <br />COMPANIES REPRESENTED DID NOT SEEM TO HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO SUBMITTING THE <br />BIDS AND STATED THAT THERE IS NOT TIME TO CANCEL THESE BIDS AND GO THROUGH <br />THIS PROCEDURE AGAIN, AND HE HOPED THE BOARD WOULD NOT CONSIDER DOING SO. <br />HE CONTINUED THAT AS TECHNICAL A SUBJECT AS THIS IS, YOU WILL NEVER GET <br />EVERYONE TO AGREE AND STATED HE FELT HIS STAFF HAS DONE A GOOD JOB IN <br />r <br />- MAKING THE EVALUATION AND WOULD LIKE THE BOARD TO MAKE A DECISION, <br />J <br />17 <br />JUL 2 01977 BOOK 30 Pact 244 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.