Laserfiche WebLink
COUNTY PLANNER BRENNAN INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THIS PROP- <br />ERTY IS LOCATED ON U. S. 1 JUST SOUTH OF SEBASTIAN AND EXTENDS TO <br />THE INDIAN RIVER. MR. BRENNAN NOTED THAT THIS PROPERTY WAS DEVELOPED <br />MANY YEARS AGO WITH MOBILE HOMES BEFORE THE ZONING CHANGED. THERE <br />ARE BOTH MOBILE AND <br />REGULAR HOMES LOCATED TO THE NORTH OF IT. MR. <br />BRENNAN EXPLAINED THAT THE APPLICANT ORIGINALLY REQUESTED THAT A FEW <br />HUNDRED FEET ON U. S. 1 BE LEFT IN COMMERCIAL ZONING, BUT THE PLANN- <br />ING DEPARTMENT PREVAILED UPON THEM TO REQUEST THAT THE WHOLE PROP- <br />ERTY BE REZONED TO R-1RM, WHICH THEY HAVE DONE. THIS WOULD ALLOW <br />BOTH MOBILE HOMES AND CONVENTIONAL HOMES ON THIS PROPERTY. HE NOTED <br />THAT THEY WANT TO HAVE WHAT IS THERE CONFORMING, BUT WANT TO DEVELOP <br />THE REMAINING PROPERTY ONLY IN MOBILE HOMES. <br />COMMISSIONER DEESON ASKED WHY SHOULDN'T THE FRONT HUNDRED <br />FEET BE LEFT IN COMMERCIAL IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT <br />IS LOCATED NEAR SEBASTIAN HIGHLANDS. HE STATED THAT HE PERSONALLY <br />FELT THAT THIS AREA AND POSSIBLY HALF A MILE NORTH AND SOUTH OF IT <br />ON U. S. 1 SHOULD BE COMMERCIAL. <br />COUNTY PLANNER BRENNAN EXPLAINED THAT THE PLANNING DEPART- <br />MENT HAD WANTED TO DO AWAY WITH SOME OF THE COMMERCIAL ON U. S. 1, <br />AND THIS REQUEST GAVE THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A SPOT TO STOP THE <br />COMMERCIAL. HE NOTED THAT THEY HAVE HAD SOME OBJECTIONS SINCE WORD OF <br />THIS HAS SPREAD. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE INQUIRED ABOUT THE MINIMUM LOT AREA RE- <br />QUIRED IN R -IRM. ` <br />ATTORNEY HENDERSON STATED THAT IT IS 10,000 SQ. FT. HE <br />CONTINUED THAT THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY EIGHT LOT OWNERS, AND NOT <br />ALL HAVE THE MINIMUM AREA REQUIRED BUT THEY WILL BE ISSUED DEEDS <br />WHICH WILL CONVEY LOTS 75 x 133 TO GIVE THEM THE NECESSARY 10,000 <br />SQ. FT. HE NOTED THAT IN ORDER TO DO THIS, SETBACKS WILL BE MEAS- <br />URED FROM THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND POINTED OUT THAT IN FIGURING <br />SQUARE FOOTAGE, YOU ARE ALLOWED TO USE THE EASEMENT. ATTORNEY <br />HENDERSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT, CONTRARY TO MR. BRENNAN'S EARLIER <br />STATEMENT,' THE CONDES DO NOT INTEND TO SUBDIVIDE ANY FURTHER; THEY <br />ARE JUST TRYING TO BRING THE PROPERTY INTO CONFORMANCE WITH ITS <br />EXISTING USE SO THE PRESENT LOT OWNERS MAY IMPROVE OR REPLACE THEIR <br />0 Ci 191977 , . <br />l <br />Boox 31 QAtf 319 <br />