My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/22/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
2/22/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:06 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:08:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/22/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� � r <br />ENGINEER BEINDORF REPORTED ON THE STATUS OF THE 12TH STREET <br />AND 6TH AVENUE SEWER LINE AND PRESENTED THE BOARD WITH A MAP OF THE <br />AREA SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE REQUESTS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE BY PROPERTY <br />OWNERS TO TIE ONTO THIS LINE. HE EXPLAINED THAT THIS DRAWING REPRESENTS <br />APPROXIMATELY SS ACRES. IT IS NOT DONE IN ANY CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER AND <br />DOES NOT SHOW ANY OF THE EXISTING TREATMENT PLANTS IN THE AREA. MOST <br />OF THE ZONING IN THE AREA IS. R-2, WHICH WILL ALLOW A MAXIMUM DENSITY <br />SOF 15, OR A'POTENTIAL OF ABOUT 2,600 PEOPLE, MR. BEINDORF FELT THIS <br />PROBABLY IS A LITTLE MORE THAN THE LINE IS CAPABLE OF SERVING; THEY HAD <br />FIGURED ON ABOUT 2,000. HE ALSO STATED THAT OF OUR ORIGINAL WATER <br />a <br />ALLOCATION, THERE IS' PROBABLY A LITTLE MORE LEFT THAN THIS LINE COULD <br />PROPERLY HANDLE. <br />ENGINEER BEINDORF STATED THAT, AS HE SEES IT, THE BOARD HAS <br />THREE ALTERNATIVES. THE FIRST WOULD BE TO TAKE OVER THE LINE AND HAVE <br />THE PEOPLE TIE ON AS COUNTY CUSTOMERS, WHICH WOULD MEAN THAT THE COUNTY <br />WOULD HAVE TO MAINTAIN THE LINE, DETERMINE HOW CUSTOMERS WOULD TIE ONTO <br />THE LINE, HAVE THE SEWAGE FLOW METER INSTALLED, AND SET UP A DEPARTMENT <br />TO COLLECT THE MONIES FOR THIS SERVICE. THE SECOND ALTERNATIVE WOULD <br />BE TO ASK THE CITY TO TAKE THESE PEOPLE AS THEIR CUSTOMERS, WHICH IS <br />BASICALLY WHAT HAS BEEN DONE WITH VERO MALL. THIS AREA IS NOT SERVED <br />WITH CITY WATER, AND SO THERE MUST BE COOPERATION BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND <br />THE CITY AND THE LAND OWNERS TO BE SURE THE CITY COULD COLLECT THE <br />MONIES, ALSO, THE CITY WOULD WANT ASSURANCE ABOUT THE TYPE OF WATER <br />COMING INTO THEIR SYSTEM. THERE WOULD BE NO NEED ON THIS BASIS FOR A <br />METER ON THE AMOUNT OF WATER GOING INTO THE CITY PLANT, AS A THIRD <br />ALTERNATIVE, THE COUNTY COULD SAY WE WANT TO DO THIS OURSELVES AND <br />COTRACT TO ANOTHER PARTY TO HANDLE COLLECTIONS, ETC, <br />• ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT IF THE FLOW <br />METER HAS TO BE INSTALLED,' IT COULD TAKE ANYWHERE FROM 90 DAYS TO SIX <br />MONTHS TO GET ONE DELIVERED, WHICH IS ONE REASON THE DEVELOPER WANTED <br />TO PUT UP THE CHECK INSTEAD OF HAVING TO PURCHASE THE METER. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED HE PERSONALLY FELT THAT WE ARE <br />NOT READY FOR OPTION #1, WHICH IS TO ACCEPT SERVICE, METER OUR OWN <br />OPERATION,AND ESTABLISH OUR OWN DEPARTMENT. HE FELT HE WOULD PREFER TO <br />41 <br />FEB 2 2 197-8 <br />oaK 34 PAGE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.