My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/5/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
4/5/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:07 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:10:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/05/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HE STATED THAT THIS WILL BE A GREAT HELP TO BOTH THE COMMUNITY AND <br />THE COMMISSION AS IT WILL PROVIDE A HIGHER GRADE OF PLANS TO WORK <br />WITH AND WILL MAKE SOMEONE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE CORRECT <br />INFORMATION. MR. SCHLITT STATED THAT THE ARCHITECTS, THEREFORE, <br />WISH TO HAVE THE WORDING OF THE ORDINANCE CHANGED TO REQUIRE A <br />SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION TO BE PROPERLY SIGNED AND SEALED <br />BY A PROFESSIONAL. <br />MR; SCHLITT CONTINUED THAT PROBLEMS HAVE ARISEN IN THE <br />PAST WHERE THESE APPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN DONE BY UNEMPLOYED AERO- <br />SPACE ENGINEERS WHO ARE NOT COMPETENT CIVIL ENGINEERS, AND HE FELT <br />A REQUIREMENT THAT ENGINEERS ALSO BE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORS <br />WOULD PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING. MR, SCHLITT FELT IT WOULD <br />SUFFICE IF THE ORDINANCE REQUIRED COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE STATUTE, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT HE CONSIDERED MAKING <br />REFERENCE DIRECTLY TO THE STATE STATUTE, BUT DID NOT WANT TO SEE <br />THE BOARD GET IN THE MIDDLE OF A POLITICAL SITUATION AND, THEREFORE, <br />KEPT THE ORDINANCE AS BROAD AS POSSIBLE BY MERELY ADDING "LICENSED <br />ARCHITECTS OR ENGINEERS." HE STATED THAT HE WOULD NOT HAVE ANY <br />PROBLEM WITH ADDING "SIGNED AND SEALED." <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED IN REGARD TO "LICENSED ARCHITECTS <br />OR ENGINEERS," AND IT WAS FELT THE ORDINANCE SHOULD STATE THAT THEY <br />MUST BE*REGISTERED IN FLORIDA. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT SUGGESTED THAT ON PAGE 7, PARAGRAPH 3, <br />THE ORDINANCE SHOULD REQUIRE THAT AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER CERTIFY <br />THAT THE WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. <br />CHARLES BLOCK, ARCHITECT, FELT IT IS A GOOD MOVE TO HAVE A <br />PROFESSIONAL INVOLVED IN THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCEDURE FROM THE <br />BEGINNING.. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT WITH THE REQUIRING <br />OF A FLORIDA LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, AND REQUIRING THAT AN <br />.ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER CERTIFY*COMPLETION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE <br />APPROVED SITE PLAN, THE ORDINANCE.WOULD BE SATISFACTORY TO HIM. <br />37 <br />APR' 5 1973ss�� j�4 Ff�c. <br />Plow <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.