Laserfiche WebLink
COMMISSIONER lODTKE AGREED. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY DISCUSSED THE NEED FOR REQUIRING A <br />TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. <br />ASSISTANT PLANNER BERG STATED THAT HE BELIEVED BOTH HE' <br />AND THE ADMINISTRATOR FEEL A TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE SHOULD BE <br />INCLUDED IN THE ORDINANCE. <br />ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS AGREED THAT IT SHOULD BE SPELLED <br />OUT. <br />.JOHN SCHLITT, ARCHITECT, NOTED THIS IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE <br />PROCEDURE AND HE DOES NOT.BELIEVE IT NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT THE BOARD HAS THE <br />AUTHORITY TO DRAW UPON WHATEVER EXPERTISE IT DESIRES, AND HE DID <br />NOT BELIEVE A FORMAL COMMITTEE IS NECESSARY. THE ATTORNEY NOTED <br />THAT THE EXPERTISE SHOULD BE AVAILABLE, BUT COULD BE DISCRETIONARY <br />AND STATED THAT HE COULD COME UP WITH SOME WORDING TO CLARIFY THE <br />SITUATION. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER AGREED THAT HE WOULD RATHER SEE THIS <br />DISCRETIONARY THAN MANDATORY. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LOY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO REWORD <br />THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AS PER THE CHANGES DISCUSSED TODAY AND ADOPTED <br />ORDINANCE 78-10.AS SO REWORDED, <br />38 <br />6 <br />eooc: <br />