My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/19/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
4/19/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:07 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:12:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Board of Supervisors
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/19/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER EXPLAINED THAT MR. REGAN TOOK THE <br />PRIORITY LIST AND GROUPED THE ROADS THAT WERE IN A*CERTAIN AREA BECAUSE <br />THE GOVERNMENT PREFERS THAT WE CONCENTRATE ON ONE AREA AT A TIME. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER POINTED OUT THAT WE ARE JUST STARTING OUR THIRD <br />YEAR PROGRAM NOW AND WILL BE FOLLOWING RIGHT ON THROUGH INTO NEXT YEARS <br />PROGRAM SO THE ROADS WILL BE BUILT, BUT THE PRIORITY HAS BEEN SHUFFLED <br />AROUND A LITTLE IN ORDER TO GROUP THE ROADS AND IMPROVE OUR CHANCES <br />OF BEING FUNDED. <br />MR, LUNDY ONCE AGAIN STATED THAT HE FELT THE PARK IS THE <br />PROJECT THAT WOULD BE USED BY THE MOST PEOPLE AND THAT FUNDS SHOULD BE <br />INCLUDED FOR RECREATION. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT MR. LUNDY SUBMITTED A LIST <br />OF RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WHICH THEY REVIEWED, AND <br />THE PROPOSED PROGRAM IS WHAT THE COMMITTEE IS RECOMMENDING. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER NOTED THAT PARKS WERE THE NUMBER ONE <br />PRIORITY IN THE THIRD YEAR GRANT, ANIT APPARENTLY MR. LUNDY IS ASKING IF <br />THE PARKS ARE NOT COMPLETED IN THIS YEAR'S PROGRAM, WILL WE HAVE TROUBLE <br />COMPLETING THEM IN NEXT YEAR'S EXPENDITURES. <br />MR. REGAN STATED THAT HE IS IN COMPLETE ACCORD WITH MR. LUNDY <br />IN REGARD TO PARKS. HE NOTED THAT THEY HAVE ALLOCATED FUNDS FROM <br />THE SECOND YEAR FOR PARKS, BUT -THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1977 <br />REQUIRES THAT A COMMUNITY EITHER ENGAGE IN A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM <br />OR A SINGLE PURPOSE PROGRAM. A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM WOULD HAVE RE- <br />QUIRED US TO CHANNEL ALL OUR EFFORTS INTO ONE SMALL AREA, WHICH MOST <br />PROBABLY WOULD NOT HAVE ENCOMPASSED THE PARK AREA. IN ORDER NOT TO <br />LEAVE OUT ANY OF THE THREE TARGET AREAS, THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br />VOTED TO PROCEED WITH A SINGLE PURPOSE GRANT SINCE MOST OF THE THINGS <br />WE HAVE -BEEN DOING IN THE PAST FIT THE DEFINITION OF A SINGLE PURPOSE <br />PROGRAM. THEREFORE, IN ORDER TO COMPLETE MOST OF THE WORK THAT IS <br />UNDER WAY AND AT THE SAME•TIME COMPLETE AREAS THAT COULD BE USED FOR <br />COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAMS IN THE FUTURE, THEY HAVE ALLOCATED FUNDS TO <br />DEVELOPING THESE CLUSTERS OF STREETS. MR, REGAN EXPLAINED THAT HE AND <br />CONSULTANT BILL BRISSOM BOTH AGREED THAT THERE IS NO WAY TO GO AFTER <br />FUNDS FOR PARKS UNDER THE NEW REQUIREMENTS. HE NOTED THAT THERE ARE <br />STILL FUNDS LEFT FROM THE SECOND YEAR FOR PARKS, AND ALSO THEY ARE <br />APPLYING TO HAVE SOME OF THE ROAD MONEY FOR THE THIRD YEAR PUT INTO <br />87 <br />APR 191978 Booz 34 �AuWj <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.