My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/19/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
4/19/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:07 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:12:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Board of Supervisors
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/19/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br />PARKS. HE STATED THAT THEY HAVE JUSTIFICATION TO ASK FOR $17,000 TO <br />BE TRANSFERRED IN THIS MANNER UNDER THAT GRANT, AND HE THUS IS HOPEFUL <br />THAT WORK ON THE PARKS CAN BE CONTINUED. <br />MR. LUNDY STATED THAT THERE IS A SHORTAGE OF HOUSING IN <br />THE TARGET AREAS, AND HE FELT THE $13,000 DESIGNATED TO DEMOLISH DE- <br />TERIORATED STRUCTURES COULD BETTER BE PUT INTO PARKS. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT UNDER THE NEW GUIDELINES, IF <br />WE ASK FOR THIS, WE COULD VERY WELL BE TURNED DOWN FOR THE WHOLE GRANT. <br />MR. LUNDY STATED THAT GIFFORD IS THE ONLY AREA WITH NO <br />SUPERVISED RECREATIONAL FACILITY AND THE PEOPLE WANT THE PARK COMPLETED <br />SO IT CAN BE USED, <br />COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT THE PARK CAN BE UTILIZED WITHOUT <br />.BEING TOTALLY COMPLETED. <br />MR. REGAN NOTED THAT THIS IS THEIR NUMBER ONE PRIORITY AND IS <br />AN ON-GOING BUDGET ITEM NOW, AND IN ADDITION, THERE IS A CHANGE OF A <br />LINE ITEM TO BE APPLIED TO PARKS BECAUSE WHILE IN THE THIRD YEAR, THERE <br />IS NO ITEM FOR RECREATION, THERE IS MORE THAN ENOUGH FOR PAVING. <br />THE BOARD WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THERE WAS MONEY IN <br />THE THIRD YEAR GRANT FOR RECREATION, BUT MR. REGAN ASSURED. THEM THAT <br />THERE WAS NOT. <br />MR. LUNDY STATED THAT THE ONLY MONEY THAT HAVE NOW FOR RECREA- <br />TION IS THE $2,000 LEFT FROM THE SECOND GRANT, BUT NOTHING FROM THE <br />THIRD GRANT. <br />MR. REGAN AGREED, BUT REITERATED THAT THEY WILL TRY TO GET A <br />LINE ITEM CHANGED IN ORDER TO GET MONEY FOR RECREATION, AND HE FELT <br />THERE IS A HIGH PROBABILITY THIS CAN BE DONE. <br />MR. REGAN CONTINUED THAT HE AGREED WITH MR. LUNDY'S SUGGESTION <br />. THAT IF WE ARE GOING TO A.PROGRAM OF REHABILITATION AND COOPERATION WITH <br />THE FARM WORKERS COUNCIL AND THE EOC, THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITIZENS <br />ADVISORY COMMITTEE SHOULD REVIEW AND APPROVE THE HOUSES TO BE WORKED ON. <br />HE STATED THAT HE WILL BRING THIS UP AT THEIR NEXT MEETING. MR. REGAN <br />DISCUSSED DEMOLITION OF DETERIORATED HOUSING AND POINTED OUT THAT ONLY <br />R <br />E•1•3 <br />BOox 34 <br />APP 19 1978 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.