Laserfiche WebLink
RESPONSIBILITY. HE NOTED THAT HE ALSO CHANGED SLIGHTLY THE SECTION <br />ON APPEALS. THE ATTORNEY CONTINUED THAT HE HAS TALKED WITH THE FIRE <br />OFFICIALS AND DOES NOT BELIEVE THEY HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS OR ADDITIONAL <br />COMMENTS. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED IF THE BOARD OF APPEALS IS THE <br />SAME AS THE ONE WE HAVE NOW. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT WHEN THE <br />COUNTY ADOPTED THE BUILDING CODE, IT HAD PROVISION IN IT FOR A BOARD <br />OF APPEALS, AND IT SEEMS PRACTICAL TO HIM THAT THIS BOARD WHICH IS <br />KNOWLEDGEABLE iN THE'BUILDING TRADE INDUSTRY SHOULD ALSO HANDLE <br />APPEALS"UNDER THE FIRE PREVENTION CODE. <br />t <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO ADVERTISE THE <br />PROPOSED FIRE PREVENTION CODE ORDINANCE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON <br />JUNE 7, 1978. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT IF THE BOARD SHOULD DECIDE TO <br />RESTRUCTURE THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS, HE, IN TURN, WOULD <br />RESTRUCTURE THIS ORDINANCE SO APPEALS WILL GO TO WHATEVER BOARD IS <br />ESTABLISHED. <br />INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS SUBMITTED TO THE <br />BOARD A LIST OF THE BIDS RECEIVED ON THE SALE OF COUNTY PROPERTY <br />WITH THE HIGH BIDDERS CHECKED, AND RECOMMENDED THEY BE AWARDED THE <br />BIDS. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />Loy, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE <br />INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR AND AWARDED EACH OF THE SEVEN PARCELS <br />TO THE HIGH BIDDER AS SET OUT ON THE FOLLOWING LIST. <br />24 <br />MAY 10 1978 <br />moo 3 4n <br />II <br />