Laserfiche WebLink
a <br />RESOURCES FOR AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $4,000.00 FOR DAY MARKERS AS <br />DISCUSSED ABOVE. <br />THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR NEXT DISCUSSED TAKING <br />FUNDS FROM THE SALE OF BOAT LICENSES FOR REPLACING THE DOCK AT <br />SEBASTIAN YACHT CLUB. HE STATED THAT GENERAL DEVELOPMENT WILL <br />DONATE $4,000, THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN $12,000 AND THE COUNTY HAS <br />INDICATED THEY MIGHT COME UP WITH $5,000. MR. THOMAS STATED THAT <br />THEY ARE ABOUT READY TO GO AHEAD WITH CONSTRUCTION. HE NOTED THAT. <br />THIS IS A FINE'FISHING AREA AND THE DOCK WILL BE UTILIZED BY THE <br />PEOPLE WHO PAY THESE BOATING TAXES. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THIS IS <br />JUST FOR THE DOCK, THE RAMP IS ALREADY THERE. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER ASKED IF THERE WOULD BE ANY <br />DOCKING FEES, <br />INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS STATED THAT THEY <br />HAVE NOT GOTTEN THAT FAR YET, BUT HE FELT THEY WOULD HAVE TO MAKE <br />SOME CHARGES FOR MAINTENANCE. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE IS IN FAVOR OF <br />SUPPORTING THIS PROJECT, BUT WOULD HATE TO SEE CITY RESIDENTS PAY <br />ONE DOCKING CHARGE AND COUNTY RESIDENTS ANOTHER, <br />COMMISSIONER DEESON SUGGESTED THAT A PROVISION REQUIRING <br />THE SAME FEES FOR CITY AND COUNTY RESIDENTS BE INCLUDED IN A MOTION. <br />IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THAT MONEY IS NEEDED FOR MAINTENANCE OF <br />THE DOCK. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER DEESON, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />L. LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE EXPENDITURE OF $5,000 FOR <br />THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE DOCK AT THE SEBASTIAN YACHT CLUB <br />CONDITIONED UPON THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE DOCK BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC <br />AT ALL REASONABLE TIMES; THAT THE FEES, IF CHARGED, BE CHARGED UNIFORMLY TO <br />ALL PARTICIPANTS;'AND THAT MONIES GENERATED FROM THE FEES BE USED <br />FOR MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE DOCK -FACILITY. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT AT THE COMMISSION`S'REQUEST <br />HE HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSED FIRE PREVENTION CODE ORDINANCE. HE <br />INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS MADE SEVERAL CHANGES WHICH INCLUDE <br />PUTTING THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENFORCEMENT ON THE COUNTY .ADMINISTRATOR <br />AND MAKING PROVISIONS THAT WILL LET THE ADMINISTRATOR DELEGATE THAT <br />23 <br />B00K34 FA,F 40 <br />I <br />I <br />