5/10/1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

EXPENSIVE PHYSICAL STUDY AND THEN COME BACK AND HAVE THE PLAN TURNED DOWN, BUT FELT IF THEY COULD GET TENTATIVE APPROVAL, THEN THEY WOULD NOT OBJECT TO SPENDING THE MONEY TO GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER DEESON DISCUSSED PUTTING A 10' PLANTING STIP ON THE SOUTH TO PROHIBIT DOUBLE FRONTAGE AS SUGGESTED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND THE BOARD DISCUSSED THE DEEDING OF THE LAKE. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT ONE OF THE PURPOSES OF TENTATIVE APPROVAL IS TO BE ASSURED THAT THE PROPERTY IS SOMEWHAT IN A s STATE TO BE DEVELOPED, AND HE DID NOT BELIEVE THAT THE BOARD HAS BEEN ASSURED OF THIS. DEAN LUETHJE AGREED THAT IT IS POSSIBLE THEY MIGHT HAVE TO TRUCK IN SOME OF THE FILL MATERIAL, BUT FELT IF THEY GET A TENTATIVE APPROVAL, IT WOULD NOT DO ANY HARM AS IT EXPIRES IN A YEAR IF THEY CAN'T MEET SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT THAT THE DEVELOPER SHOULD HAVE DONE SUFFICIENT WORK TO JUSTIFY THE PLANNED USE SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT HE HAS SOME QUESTION ABOUT WHO IS TO BE THE OWNER OF THE RECREATION AREA, THE BICYCLE PATHS AND THE LAKE, BECAUSE,PARTICULARLY IN A DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SIZE, IT OFTEN PRESENTS A PROBLEM IN REGARD TO MAINTENANCE AND UPKEEP, ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED -MR. LUETHJE THAT THE BOARD IS RELUCTANT TO GRANT TENTATIVE APPROVAL UNLESS THEY THINK THE t. DEVELOPER IS CAPABLE OF FOLLOWING THROUGH ON THE PROPOSED PLAN. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS DISCUSSED THE AMOUNT OF FILL NEEDED TO FILL THE AREA AND WHETHER THEY FEEL THE AMOUNT OF FILL THEY NOW HAVE AVAILABLE MIGHT SUFFICE WITHOUT HAVING TO GO INTO A GREAT EXPANSION OF THE LAKE. HE SUGGESTED THAT THEY MIGHT BE ABLE TO DO A FEW QUICK ESTIMATES WITHOUT MAKING AN EXTENSIVE STUDY, THE BOARD AGREED THAT THEY WOULD MUCH PREFER TO HAVE MORE DEFINITE INFORMATION. MR. LUETHJE ASKED MR. VILMOTH IF HE WOULD BE AGREEABLE TO THEM DOING SOME TOPOGRAPHICAL WORK AND THEN COMING BACK TO 52 MAY 10 1978 BOOK 34 PAsf9;