Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />t <br />MR. MUSICK FELT IT WOULD BE RATHER RIDICULOUS TO PUT 12' OF <br />PAVING ABUTTING THIS ROAD WITHOUT KNOWING HOW LONG IT WILL BE BEFORE <br />THE OTHER ROADS WILL BE PAVED. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE MAIN ROAD WILL <br />BE PAVED, AND THEY ARE MERELY ASKING THAT THE BOARD GRANT A VARIANCE <br />ON MAGNOLIA LANE, WHICH IS HALF 'A MARL ROAD. HE NOTED THAT THEY WOULD <br />BUILD THE OTHER HALF, BUT DO NOT,WANT TO PAVE 12' OF IT. MR. MUSICK <br />CONTINUED THAT THIS IS PROPOSED TO BE A PRIVATE ROAD SUBDIVISION, AND <br />ASKED IN THE EVENT THE BOARD REQUIRES THE DEVELOPER TO PAVE HALF THE <br />ROAD, I;F THE COUNTY WOULD PAVE THE OTHER HALF, <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THE DEVELOPER WOULD BE WILLING <br />TO PUT UP IN ESCROW HALF THE ESTIMATED COST FOR THE 12' OF PAVEMENT AND <br />HAVE THE COUNTY HOLD THAT UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THEY SAW FIT TO PAVE THE <br />OTHER HALF. HE CONTINUED THAT HE COULD NOT GIVE A DEFINITE TIME FRAME <br />FOR THE PAVING, BUT POINTED OUT THAT THE MONEY WOULD BE IN AN INTEREST <br />BEARING ACCOUNT. <br />MR. MUSICK NOTED THAT THE DEVELOPER IS DEDICATING 25' OF LAND <br />AND THEY COULD FAVE DOWN THE CENTER LINE TO AVOID THE PROBLEMS BROUGHT <br />ABOUT BY PAVING JUST ONE HALF. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS POINTED OUT THAT WE DO HAVE CERTAIN <br />SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS WHICH REQUIRE CERTAIN THINGS AND HE WOULD BE <br />HESITANT TO SEE ANY WAIVER MADE. HE NOTED THAT THE COUNTY DOES NOT <br />HAVE AN ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND COULD NOT ASSESS THE SIX OWNERS LOCATED <br />ON MAGNOLIA LANE AS SUGGESTED IN MR. MUSICK'S LETTER. THE ADMINISTRATOR <br />CONTINUED THAT HE DOES NOT FEEL THAT 12' PAVING WOULD BE A DETRIMENT <br />TO THE PEOPLE ON THESE SIX LOTS AS THERE IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN THIS <br />AREA WHEN IT RAINS. HE AGREED THAT THEY COULD CONSTRUCT THE ROAD ON <br />THE CENTER LINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY DID NOT FEEL WE HAVE ANY CHOICE BECAUSE WE <br />DO HAVE REGULATIONS AND SHE DOES NOT FEEL THEY SHOULD BE BENT BECAUSE <br />THE PAVED ROAD WILL SERVE THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT IS DESIGNED, I.E., <br />TO ENHANCE THE SUBDIVISION. <br />MR. MUSICK ASKED IF THE BOARD WOULD CONSIDER GIVING TENTATIVE <br />APPROVAL WITHOUT THEM HAVING TO GO BACK THROUGH THE SUBDIVISION REVIEW <br />COMMITTEE IF THE PLAN IS REVISED TO PRESENT THIS WITH THE ROAD BEING <br />CENTERED ON THE 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE DEVELOPER WILL CONSTRUCT IT. <br />14 <br />8011) <br />0K 34 Pa,F 450 <br />J <br />