7/19/1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING REDICK AGREED THAT BY PUTTING R-1 IN A C-1 AREA YOU COULD BE CREATING A POTENTIAL SITUATION OF CONFLICT. HE FELT A LONG RANGE STUDY OF THE AREA WOULD BE IN ORDER, THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. THERE WERE NOME. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMIS— SIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, TO DENY THE REQUESTED ZONING CHANGE TO R—IA ON THE BASIS THAT THIS IS MEDIUM DENSITY SURROUNDED BY COMMERCIAL, AND R—IA WOULD NOT BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE AREA, COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT HE ACTUALLY WOULD LIKE THE PETITIONER TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO WITHDRAW AND RESUBMIT RATHER THAN JUST DENY THE REQUEST, ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE PETITIONER COULD REAPPLY DIRECTLY TO THE COUNTY COMMISSION WITHOUT HAVING TO GO THROUGH THE WHOLE PROCESS, IF THE BOARD SO DESIRED. a CHAIRMAN WODTKE EXPLAINED TO MR. ALTMAN THAT IF HE WITH— DREW HIS REQUEST, THE BOARD WOULD GIVE HIM THE OPPORTUNITY TO COME DIRECTLY TO THE BOARD WITH HIS SECOND REQUEST. MR. ALTMAN, STATED THAT, IN THIS EVENT, HE WOULD WITHDRAW THE REQUEST MADE BY MR. & MRS. DETTORE FOR REZONING TO R -1A AND WOULD READVERTISE AND REAPPLY TO THE BOARD FOR R 2B ZONING. COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER WITHDREW HIS MOTION TO DENY THE REZONING, AND COMMISSIONER SIEBERT WITHDREW HIS SECOND. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO HEAR THE PETITION FOR REZONING OF THE DETTORE PROPERTY DIRECTLY WITHOUT IT HAVING TO GO BACK TO THE ZONING COMMISSION AND AUTHORIZED ADVERTISEMENT FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON REZONING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TO R -2B ON AUGUST 23, 1978, AT 2:00 P.M. ATTORNEY WILLIAM CALDWELL CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENT— ING PROPERTY OWNERS EAST OF WAB ASSO BRIDGE AND NORTH OF THE TOWN OF 64 j If JUL 191978