8/9/1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

R COMMISSIONER SIEBERT AGREED AND NOTED THAT HEAD START AND OTHER GROUPS DO USE THIS. SITE NOW. COMMISSIONER DEESON STATED HE ALSO WAS CONCERNED THAT THE USAGE OF THE'PROPERTY MIGHT CHANGE AND THE FENCE MIGHT BE NEEDED, CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT EVEN IF THE FENCE WERE AVAILABLE, THE BOARD WORLD HAVE A -PROBLEM UTILIZING IT FOR SOMETHING OTHER THAN A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY. IT WAS AGREED THAT THE FENCE COULD NOT BE DONATED TO THE BAPTIST RETIREMENT CENTER. THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED A LETTER FROM SUPERINTENDENT MCCLURE REQUESTING THE COUNTY'S COOPERATION IN REGARD TO DRAINAGE PROBLEMS AND PAVING NEEDED AT THE VERO BEACH SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAS A ROUGH SKETCH OF WHAT HE BELIEVES THIS WOULD REQUIRE. HE NOTED THAT HE WOULD HAVE TO RUN LEVELS TO FIND A WAY TO DRAIN THE WATER OFF AND POINTED OUT THAT HE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT IS UNDER THE PAVING. HE CON— TINUED THAT THEY NEED SOME FILL AND WOULD LIKE THE ENTIRE AREA RECAPPED. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT QUESTIONED WHETHER IT IS THE COUNTY'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PAVE A SCHOOL PARKING LOT. - CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT WE HAVE ASSISTED IN THIS AREA BEFORE BECAUSE OF OUR BID CONTRACT, BUT THE SCHOOL BOARD HAS PAID FOR THE MATERIALS. HE ASKED IF THAT WAS THEIR INTENTION. ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS SAID THAT HE DID NOT UNDERSTAND IT THAT WAY, COMMISSIONER'SIEBERT STATED THAT, THOUGH HE_HATED TO APPEAR UNCOOPERATIVE, HE FELT THIS IS THE SCHOOL S RESPONSIBILITY SINCE THEY COLLECT A TAX JUST AS THE BOARD DOES. HE CONTINUED THAT IF WE CAN HELP THROUGH OUR ANNUAL BID PROCESS WITH MATERIALS, AND THEY WANT TO PAY FOR IT, THAT IS FINE. .COMMISSIONER LOY AND CHAIRMAN WODTKE CONCURRED THAT THIS IS A CAPITAL MAINTENANCE ITEM AND DOES FALL INTO THE SCHOOL BOARDS RE— SPONSIBILITY. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Wal