My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/10/2006 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
10/10/2006 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2022 1:09:56 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:11:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/10/2006
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3127
Book and Page
131, 562-600
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />A. RES/E’P <br />EQUEST FROM DDIE OOKHOODDIES ROPERTY <br />I,I.RDL <br />NVESTMENTS NC FOR EDUCTION OF EMOLITION IEN AND <br />SQTS <br />ETTLEMENT OF UIET ITLE UIT <br /> <br />Assistant County Attorney William DeBraal provided background information on <br />the Request for Reduction of Demolition Lien and the lawsuit brought by Eddie’s Property <br />Investment by recapping his memorandum of October 4, 2006. <br /> <br />Administrator Baird informed the Board “staff does not recommend waiving the <br />fees.” Discussion ensued regarding demolition of the house. <br /> <br />Eddie Sookhoo <br /> acknowledged that he had not done all his research and was aware <br />of the lien when he purchased the property. What he did not know was how much the <br />interest would have been. He asked the Board to waive the interest allowing him to pay the <br />principal cost the County had expended for the demolition. <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY Commissioner Davis, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Bowden, to approve staff’s <br />recommendation <br /> <br />Commissioner Davis applauded Mr. Sookhoo’s entrepreneurial spirits and was sure <br />Mr. Sookhoo would do well with the property, but felt that as a fiduciary responsibility to <br />the taxpayers who footed the bill to remove the structure on the property, they were due <br />back their interest. <br /> <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and <br />the Motion carried 4-0 (Commissioner Wheeler <br />October 10, 2006 <br />21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.