My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/10/2006 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
10/10/2006 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2022 1:09:56 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:11:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/10/2006
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3127
Book and Page
131, 562-600
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />absent). The Board denied Mr. Sookhoo’s request <br />for reduction of Demolition Lien and Settlement <br />of Quiet Title Suit. <br /> <br /> <br />13. COMMISSIONERS’ ITEMS <br /> <br />A.CAR.N,C <br />OMMISSIONER RTHUR EUBERGER HAIRMAN <br />Chairman Neuberger wanted to discuss a problem he had placing an item on the <br />Agenda last week. He reminded the Board of a request he had from Annabelle North who <br />wanted an audience with him but he did not want to meet with her individually so he had <br />her “request to speak” listed on the Agenda instead. The Chairman said he found out later <br />that evening that the item was removed from the Agenda by the County Administrator’s <br />Office after consultation with the County Attorney’s Office. The Chairman felt they <br />needed to establish some ground rules as to who can add and remove items from the <br />Agenda. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lowther understood and agreed that a Commissioner could add <br />anything he wants under his “Comments”. <br /> <br />Attorney Collins explained that due to the nature of the request, he felt the matter <br />could be quasi-judicial and would mean the item has to be advertised. He, therefore, <br />deemed the item procedurally inappropriate and agreed that the item should be pulled. <br /> <br />Chairman Neuberger believed that despite the nature of an item that is placed under <br />“Commissioner’s Comments” on the Agenda, the decision to pull such item should be <br />handled at the Meeting so everyone is aware of the action. The Chairman felt they needed <br />to set some precedent on how such matters are handled. <br />October 10, 2006 <br />22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.