My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/19/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
10/19/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2018 1:18:49 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:04:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/19/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2966
Book and Page
127, 728-787
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
444
Document Relationships
2004-048
(Cover Page)
Path:
\Official Documents\2000's\2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />A1A. It would not be feasible to widen the bridge because of the steepness of the grade. You <br />would have to start over and build a new bridge. <br /> <br /> The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard regarding this matter. There being <br />none, the Chairman closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Neuberger, to approve <br />staff’s recommendation. <br /> <br /> Chairman Ginn and Commissioner Macht both felt that RS-3 zoning would be a much <br />better fit for that property. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Macht commented that the history of a community is shaped in several <br />ways, one of which is catastrophic events. When he saw his neighbor’s roof in his yard after the <br />hurricanes, he realized things would never be the same. He did not think computer modeling for <br />future catastrophic hurricanes included people coming south from Brevard County or people <br />moving north from the central part of our County when other options are not available. While it is <br />true that the barrier island has been developed at less than the permitted density, he believed this <br />would be a good time to establish limitations at 3 units per acre. The applicant still has the choice <br />to develop a PD and the Board has never adversely impacted any developer applying for a PD <br />project. He could not vote for RS-6 for this property. <br /> <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the <br />Motion failed by a 2-3 vote (Chairman Ginn and <br />Commissioners Macht and Lowther opposed). <br /> <br />OCTOBER 19, 2004 17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.