Laserfiche WebLink
requirement for a performance bond, as a condition of obtaining a moving permit, and one prong in <br />the overall effort to deliver affordable/workforce housing. <br />Bob Hamner and Scott Dillon, Three Brothers and a Sister, LLC, explained their <br />financial hardship and requested the Board waive the bonding requirement for them and to <br />consider amending the Code. <br />Commissioner Davis was concerned how much of a hardship could it be when the return on <br />the money takes place once the house is tied down. He also was concerned that removing the <br />performance bond would be taking away security to the County. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Neuberger, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Bowden, to direct the <br />County Attorney to bring back for approval an amendment <br />to the code ordinance Section 955.05(l) deleting the <br />performance bond. <br />Joseph Paladin, 730 Commerce Drive, questioned whether the Ordinance can be <br />amended by October 31st <br />Attorney Collins advised they can invoke a pending ordinance doctrine. <br />MOTION WAS AMENDED by Commissioner Neuberger <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Bowden, to include <br />invoking the pending ordinance doctrine. <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion <br />passed, by a 4-1 vote, Commissioner Davis opposed. (The <br />Board authorized the County Attorney to draft an <br />amendment to the Indian River County Code Section <br />955.05(l) deleting the requirements of a performance bond <br />October 4, 2005 40 <br />