My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/07/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
10/07/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2018 2:58:01 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:19:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/07/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4021
Subject
Purchasing Ordinance
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7256
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
B. COMMISSIONER WESLEY S. DAVIS, VICE CHAIRMAN <br />I. DRAFT LETTER TO OWNERS TO GAUGE INTEREST IN AN MSB U <br />FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS <br />Vice Chairman Davis informed the Board that Mr. Scannell has requested that his <br />road be graded through the County's Petition Grading Program, and stated that the subject road <br />has been brought up to County standards. Vice Chairman Davis wished to see those roads <br />incorporated on the grading list, and he asked for Board approval of the draft letter for <br />conceptual approval to send same to property owners on 87th Street. <br />Attorney Collins in response to Vice Chairman Davis stated that the subject area <br />did not have an Association, but they had filed a Declaration of Covenants Restrictions and <br />Obligations for roadway maintenance that created easements for ingress and egress on four roads <br />in the area (85th, 87th, 89th and 90 Streets) and it apportioned responsibility for maintenance of <br />the roads to the owners of the properties adjacent to those roads. <br />Vice Chairman Davis said his first Motion would be to direct staff to visit the area <br />to see if they met the criteria of our Petition Grading Program, and if they do, to have them <br />added to our grading list. <br />Commissioner Flescher said he would support that Motion, and Administrator Baird <br />cautioned about making decisions because of the similarity to the Murphy Deed. He suggested <br />staff brings this back with a report. <br />Mr. Scannell argued the concept of an MSBU, which is to construct a road where there <br />is none or to substantially improve a road where there is a deficiency. He pointed out that <br />neither was the case with his road and it did not need to be substantially improved, but needed to <br />be graded periodically. He requested that the County provide the grader and the local residents <br />October 7, 2008 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.