Laserfiche WebLink
provide the necessary material and they would have an informal MSBU; and there would be no <br />expense to the County other than what it normally expends on other roads. <br />Attorney Collins explained the County's current policy to not accept maintenance of any <br />roads unless they are paved, and he and Vice Chairman Davis disagreed on that detail. <br />Administrator Baird reiterated his suggestion for staff to bring the mater back for <br />further review and consideration. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Davis to <br />direct staff to go out and tell us why these roads <br />whenever they were installed would not meet the <br />program that we have in place for grading. MOTION <br />DIED for lack of a Second. <br />Attorney Collins opined on the assignment of the County's rights of ingress egress, while <br />Commissioners, staff and Mr. Scannell continued to debate the MSBU, whether to release the <br />letter, and the justification of paving some roads versus others. <br />There was A CONSENSUS to bring this matter back for consideration. <br />2. MARRIAGE PROTECTIONAMENDMENT <br />Vice Chairman Davis requested that the Board authorize the County Attorney to <br />draft a Resolution of support for the Marriage Protection Amendment (a/k/a the Federal <br />Marriage Amendment), and introduced Joan McGarvey, 615 39th Court SW, Coordinator for <br />Marriage Amendment for the State. <br />October 7, 2008 35 <br />