My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/26/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
10/26/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:08 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:43:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/26/1978
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WITH A DEVELOPER, EARL PADGETT, RECOMMENDED THAT AN AREA OF SOUTH BEACH <br />BE DOWNGRADED TO MULTIPLE DWELLINGS. THIS REQUEST WAS DENIED BY THE <br />COUNTY COMMISSION AND THE VOTE WAS 4 TO 1. MR. CRAWFORD NOTED THAT AT <br />THAT MEETING, MR. SIEBERT STATED THAT IF THE PROJECT WERE APPROVED, <br />SHE WAS AFRAID IT WOULD ALTER THE FACE OF THE WHOLE COUNTY AND SAID, <br />SEE IT AS A STEP FOR MORE CONDOMINIUMS, AND THE SINGLE FAMILY <br />DEVELOPMENTS WILL FALL BY THE DOMINO THEORY." MR. CRAWFORD STATED THAT <br />THE PROPOSED CHANGE IS NOTHING BUT ILL DISGUISED SPOT ZONING FOR THE <br />PURPOSES OF ONE DEVELOPER, WHO FOR THE SECOND TIME IN FIVE YEARS HAS <br />TRIED TO INVADE THE SOUTH BEACH AREA FOR HIS OWN FINANCIAL GAIN. HE <br />STATED IF THE CHANGE IS APPROVED, THERE WILL BE DEVELOPERS SITTING LIKE <br />VULTURES ON A RIDGE POLE WAITING TO DEVOUR THE DEFENSELESS BODY OF <br />SOUTH BEACH. MR. CRAWFORD NOTED THAT FROM SEBASTIAN BEACH TO THE <br />SOUTH COUNTY LINE IS ABOUT 20 MILES, AND, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SEVERAL <br />SMALL AREAS, IT IS IMULTI-FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL. THEY ARE JUST ASKING <br />TO KEEP ONE VERY SMALL AREA AS PRESENTLY DESIGNATED. MR. CRAWFORD <br />STATED THAT THEY HAVE TAKEN THE CONTEMPLATED RAVISHMENT OF THE AREA <br />SO SERIOUSLY THAT THEY BANDED TOGETHER TO FIGHT IT AND WILL CONTINUE <br />TO.FIGHT IT THROUGH THE COURTS IF NECESSARY. HE STATED THEY WOULD <br />NOT ASK THE COMMISSION TO DEFEAT THIS MEASURE UNLESS THEY THOUGHT IT <br />WAS A DETRIMENT TO THE COUNTY AS A WHOLE. MR. CRAWFORD THEN INFORMED <br />THE BOARD THAT THEY HAVE EMPLOYED A PLANNER, THE FIRM OF BARKER, <br />OSHER & ANDERSON, TO MAKE A SURVEY OF THE ENTIRE COUNTY AT THEIR OWN <br />EXPENSE. <br />ATTORNEY CLEM CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENTING THE PROPERTY <br />OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS. HE INTRODUCED RICHARD ORMAN.OF BARKER, OSHER & <br />ANDERSON, NOTHING THAT HE HAS A PHD IN METROPOLITAN PLANNING AND HAS <br />BEEN A CITY PLANNER. HE STATED THAT DR. ORMAN IS VERY ACTIVE IN THE <br />PLANNING FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANS OF COMMUNITIES UP AND DOWN THE EAST <br />COAST OF FLORIDA. <br />RICHARD ORMAN OF NORTH PALM BEACH CAME BEFORE THE BOARD AND <br />HANDED TO THE CLERK FIVE COPIES OF THEIR WRITTEN REPORT FOR THE RECORD. <br />DR .ORMAN STATED THAT THEY DID SURVEY THE ENTIRE COUNTY ON A NUMBER <br />M1 <br />OF ISSUES, BUT THEIR MAIN FOCUS WAS ON THE BEACH. DR. ORMAN DISPLAYED <br />A GRAPH SHOWING A GENERAL SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS.IN THE SOUTH <br />10 <br />.� <br />OCT 2 (0 1978 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.