My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/26/1978
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1978
>
10/26/1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:40:08 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 10:43:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />t <br />BEACH AREA AND STATED THE PURPOSE OF THEIR REPORT IS TO REVIEW THE <br />FACTS TAKEN.INTO CONSIDERATION BY THE PLANNER AND ALSO TO PRESENT <br />ACCEPTABLE PLANNING PRACTICES FOR MAKING THESE DETERMINATIONS AND TO <br />..FULLY JUSTIFY THE FACTS AND PLANNING PROCEDURES. HE STATED THAT THEY <br />ECONCLUDE THAT IT IS NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE SOUTH BEACH OR THE <br />- COUNTY AS.A WHOLE TO MAKE THE CHANGES PROPOSED. IN REGARD TO THE STUDY <br />CALLED "THE COST OF SPRAWL," HE AGREED YOU CERTAINLY DON'T WANT THE <br />WHOLE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY TO BE ON A SINGLE FAMILY BASIS, BUT DID <br />NOT FEEL A STUDY THIS EXTENSIVE CAN APPLY TO THE SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD <br />OF SOUTH BEACH. HE NOTED THAT MR. BRENNAN'S REPORT TO THE COMMISSION <br />EMPHASIZED THE IMPORTANCE OF THE 17TH STREET BRIDGE IN CREATING ACCESS <br />AND A NEED FOR MORE COMMERCIAL IN THE BEACH AREA. DR. ORMAN POINTED OUT <br />THAT BRIDGES, LIKE ROADS, GO BOTH WAYS AND FELT CERTAIN THERE WILL BE <br />MORE GOING FROM THE ISLAND TO THE MAINLAND TO SHOP THAN THE REVERSE. <br />DR. ORMAN THEN ADDRESSED THE BOARD'S RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER <br />THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING ACT. HE STATED THIS PLAN IS, IN FACT, <br />LAND USE LAW FOR THE COUNTY AND IF YOU ADOPT IT, YOU CANNOT ADOPT CHANGES <br />THAT VIOLATE IT. THE LAND USE LAW IS THE LAND USE MAP YOU ADOPT. <br />ORMAN CONTINUED THAT HE DOES NOT FEEL ANY DATA HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO THE <br />COMMISSION WHICH SUBSTANTIATES THE CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN REQUESTED. <br />HE THEN.DISCUSSED GOOD PLANNING PRACTICES AND FELT THERE WERE QUITE A <br />FEW STEPS OF GOOD PLANNING PRACTICES THAT HAVE NOT BEEN FOLLOWED, HE <br />STATED IF YOU DETERMINE LAND USE BEFORE YOU DETERMINE THE ENTIRETY, <br />YOU DO NOT HAVE A GOOD STRUCTURE TO WORK ON AND FELT THE CART IS A <br />LITTLE BIT BEFORE THE HORSE AS FAR AS PLANNING PROCESSES ARE CONCERNED. <br />DR. ORMAN THEN DISCUSSED EXHIBIT 2, A SITE ANALYSIS OF SEA GROVE, <br />NOTHING THAT THE AREA CLOSE TO THE RIVER HAS MANGROVE AND IS VERY <br />•STRINGENTLY CONTROLLED AS FAR AS DEVELOPMENT GOES. HE ALSO NOTED THAT <br />THE S FOOT LINE OF FLOOD HAZARD AREA TAKES IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE WHOLE <br />AREA WEST OF A -1-A AND A PORTION ON THE EAST. DR. ORMAN STATED THAT <br />IF A DECISION WERE MADE TO ALLOW 8 TO 10 UNITS PER ACRE, THAT CLUSTER <br />WOULD PROBABLY LOOK LIKE 24 TO 30 UNITS PER ACRE, AND IT WOULD END UP <br />LOOKING LIKE FT. LAUDERDALE. HE THEN INTRODUCED CHARLES. PUTNAM, WHO <br />HAS 12 YEARS EXPERIENCE AS A PLANNER AND ECONOMIST, AND WILL GIVE THE <br />BOARD AN IMPACT ANALYSIS. <br />11 <br />FAu, <br />OCT 2 6 197 <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.