10/26/1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

HAS EQUAL RIGHTS. HE ALSO NOTED THAT THERE UNDOUBTEDLY ARE OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS WHO MAY HAVE DIFFERENT OPINIONS. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING PERTAINING TO ITEM #9. COMMISSIONER Loy STATED THAT SHE WOULD REQUEST THAT THE BOARD BE ALLOWED A CHANCE TO DIGEST THE MATERIAL PRESENTED TODAY. ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD.UNANIMOUSLY INSTRUCTED THAT THE FINAL DECISION IN REGARD TO ITEM #9 BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA OF THE NOVEMBER IST MEETING AT 3:30 01CLOCK P.M. THE BOARD THEREUPON RECESSED FOR LUNCH AT 12:10 O'CLOCK P.M. AND RECONVENED AT 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. WITH THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT, THE CHAIRMAN ANNOUNCED THAT THE BOARD AT THIS TIME WOULD CONSIDER ITEM #5 AS ADVERTISED, WHICH ITEM WAS HELD OVER FROM 11:00 A.M. PLANNING DIRECTOR REDICK STATED THAT THIS AREA EXTENDS FROM NORTH OF ROSELAND ROAD ON HIGHWAY I DOWN TO THE CITY LIMITS OF SEBASTIAN AND OVER TO THE WEST. THE.PROPOSALS ARE THAT AT THE NORTH END, THE PUBLIC, SEMI -INSTITUTIONAL AREA BE EXPANDED TO THE WEST AND ACROSS THE ROAD INTO THE LOWER DENSITY AREA. HE FELT IT WAS THOUGHT THERE WOULD BE SOME CLINICS AND QUASI-GOVERNMENTAL•USES IN THAT AREA. SOUTH OF THIS, THERE IS A SMALL COMMERCIAL AREA. MR. REDICK NOTED THAT THE ZONING IN THE CITY OF SEBASTIAN ADJACENT TO THIS IS R-2 AT THIS TIME. THERE HAS BEEN A CHANGE.FROM MEDIUM DENSITY TO LOW DENSITY SOUTH OF ROSELAND ROAD. THE AREA WEST OF THE RAILROAD AND THE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA EAST OF THE EXTENSION OF SEBASTIAN, HAS NOT BEEN CHANGED, BUT THE REMAINDER HAS BEEN CHANGED FROM MEDIUM DENSITY TO AGRICULTURAL. THE SEBASTIAN AREA SOUTH OF THIS IS R-1. REASONS FOR THE RECOMMENDATION WERE THAT THERE WAS EXCESSIVE COMMERCIAL AREA TO THE NORTH OF SEBASTIAN. SECONDLY, THERE WAS A PUBLIC NEED FOR THE EXPANDED QUASI -PUBLIC AREA a EAST OF THE HOSPITAL AND'THE AREA ALONG THE RIVER THERE IS CURRENTLY IN MEDIUM DENSITY. MR. REDICK STATED THAT THE OBJECTIONS TO THIS PROPOSAL ESSENTIALLY WERE THAT THE LAND HAD BEEN PURCHASED AND ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY ALONG U.S. I AND THERE HAVE BEEN NO PARTICULAR 4 25 OCT 2 6 1978 37m.